Gait analysis is recognized as a useful assessment tool in the field of human movement research. However, doubts remain on its real effectiveness as a clinical tool, i.e. on its capability to change the diagnostic-therapeutic practice. In particular, the conditions in which evidence of a favorable cost-benefit ratio is found and the methodology for properly conducting and interpreting the exam are not identified clearly. To provide guidelines for the use of Gait Analysis in the context of rehabilitation medicine, SIAMOC (the Italian Society of Clinical Movement Analysis) promoted a National Consensus Conference which was held in Bologna on September 14th, 2013. The resulting recommendations were the result of a three-stage process entailing i) the preparation of working documents on specific open issues, ii) the holding of the consensus meeting, and iii) the drafting of consensus statements by an external Jury. The statements were formulated based on scientific evidence or experts’ opinion, when the quality/quantity of the relevant literature was deemed insufficient. The aim of this work is to disseminate the consensus statements. These are divided into 13 questions grouped in three areas of interest: 1) General requirements and management, 2) Methodological and instrumental issues, and 3) Scientific evidence and clinical appropriateness. SIAMOC hopes that this document will contribute to improve clinical practice and help promoting further research in the field.

SIAMOC position paper on gait analysis in clinical practice: General requirements, methods and appropriateness. Results of an Italian consensus conference / Benedetti, Maria Grazia; Beghi, Ettore; De Tanti, Antonio; Cappozzo, Aurelio; Basaglia, Nino; Cutti, Andrea Giovanni; Cereatti, Andrea; Stagni, Rita; Verdini, Federica; Manca, Mario; Fantozzi, Silvia; Mazzà, Claudia; Camomilla, Valentina; Campanini, Isabella; Castagna, Anna; Cavazzuti, Lorenzo; Del Maestro, Martina; Croce, Ugo Della; Gasperi, Marco; Leo, Tommaso; Marchi, Pia; Petrarca, Maurizio; Piccinini, Luigi; Rabuffetti, Marco; Ravaschio, Andrea; Sawacha, Zimi; Spolaor, Fabiola; Tesio, Luigi; Vannozzi, Giuseppe; Visintin, Isabella; Ferrarin, Maurizio. - In: GAIT & POSTURE. - ISSN 0966-6362. - 58:(2017), pp. 252-260. [10.1016/j.gaitpost.2017.08.003]

SIAMOC position paper on gait analysis in clinical practice: General requirements, methods and appropriateness. Results of an Italian consensus conference

Benedetti, Maria Grazia;De Tanti, Antonio;Campanini, Isabella;
2017

Abstract

Gait analysis is recognized as a useful assessment tool in the field of human movement research. However, doubts remain on its real effectiveness as a clinical tool, i.e. on its capability to change the diagnostic-therapeutic practice. In particular, the conditions in which evidence of a favorable cost-benefit ratio is found and the methodology for properly conducting and interpreting the exam are not identified clearly. To provide guidelines for the use of Gait Analysis in the context of rehabilitation medicine, SIAMOC (the Italian Society of Clinical Movement Analysis) promoted a National Consensus Conference which was held in Bologna on September 14th, 2013. The resulting recommendations were the result of a three-stage process entailing i) the preparation of working documents on specific open issues, ii) the holding of the consensus meeting, and iii) the drafting of consensus statements by an external Jury. The statements were formulated based on scientific evidence or experts’ opinion, when the quality/quantity of the relevant literature was deemed insufficient. The aim of this work is to disseminate the consensus statements. These are divided into 13 questions grouped in three areas of interest: 1) General requirements and management, 2) Methodological and instrumental issues, and 3) Scientific evidence and clinical appropriateness. SIAMOC hopes that this document will contribute to improve clinical practice and help promoting further research in the field.
5-gen-2017
58
252
260
SIAMOC position paper on gait analysis in clinical practice: General requirements, methods and appropriateness. Results of an Italian consensus conference / Benedetti, Maria Grazia; Beghi, Ettore; De Tanti, Antonio; Cappozzo, Aurelio; Basaglia, Nino; Cutti, Andrea Giovanni; Cereatti, Andrea; Stagni, Rita; Verdini, Federica; Manca, Mario; Fantozzi, Silvia; Mazzà, Claudia; Camomilla, Valentina; Campanini, Isabella; Castagna, Anna; Cavazzuti, Lorenzo; Del Maestro, Martina; Croce, Ugo Della; Gasperi, Marco; Leo, Tommaso; Marchi, Pia; Petrarca, Maurizio; Piccinini, Luigi; Rabuffetti, Marco; Ravaschio, Andrea; Sawacha, Zimi; Spolaor, Fabiola; Tesio, Luigi; Vannozzi, Giuseppe; Visintin, Isabella; Ferrarin, Maurizio. - In: GAIT & POSTURE. - ISSN 0966-6362. - 58:(2017), pp. 252-260. [10.1016/j.gaitpost.2017.08.003]
Benedetti, Maria Grazia; Beghi, Ettore; De Tanti, Antonio; Cappozzo, Aurelio; Basaglia, Nino; Cutti, Andrea Giovanni; Cereatti, Andrea; Stagni, Rita; Verdini, Federica; Manca, Mario; Fantozzi, Silvia; Mazzà, Claudia; Camomilla, Valentina; Campanini, Isabella; Castagna, Anna; Cavazzuti, Lorenzo; Del Maestro, Martina; Croce, Ugo Della; Gasperi, Marco; Leo, Tommaso; Marchi, Pia; Petrarca, Maurizio; Piccinini, Luigi; Rabuffetti, Marco; Ravaschio, Andrea; Sawacha, Zimi; Spolaor, Fabiola; Tesio, Luigi; Vannozzi, Giuseppe; Visintin, Isabella; Ferrarin, Maurizio
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
PIIS096663621730838X-2.pdf

accesso aperto

Tipologia: Versione dell'editore (versione pubblicata)
Dimensione 332.41 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
332.41 kB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri
Pubblicazioni consigliate

Caricamento pubblicazioni consigliate

Licenza Creative Commons
I metadati presenti in IRIS UNIMORE sono rilasciati con licenza Creative Commons CC0 1.0 Universal, mentre i file delle pubblicazioni sono rilasciati con licenza Attribuzione 4.0 Internazionale (CC BY 4.0), salvo diversa indicazione.
In caso di violazione di copyright, contattare Supporto Iris

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: http://hdl.handle.net/11380/1164382
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 18
  • Scopus 50
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 47
social impact