Recently a cell differentiation model based on noisy random Boolean networks has been proposed. This mathematical model is able to describe in an elegant way the most relevant features of cell differentiation. Noise plays a key role in this model; the different stages of the differentiation process are emergent dynamical configurations deriving from the control of the intracellular noise level. In this work we compare two approaches to this cell differentiation framework: the first one (already present in the literature) is focused on a network analysis representing the average wandering of the system among its attractors, whereas the second (new) approach takes into consideration the dynamical stories of thousands of individual cells. Results showed that under a particular noise condition the two approaches produce comparable results. Therefore both can be used to model the cell differentiation process in an integrative and complementary manner.
A comparison between threshold ergodic sets and stochastic simulation of boolean networks for modelling cell differentiation / Braccini, Michele; Roli, Andrea; Villani, Marco; Serra, Roberto. - 830:(2018), pp. 116-128. (Intervento presentato al convegno 12th Italian Workshop on Artificial Life and Evolutionary Computation, WIVACE 2017 tenutosi a ita nel 2017) [10.1007/978-3-319-78658-2_9].
A comparison between threshold ergodic sets and stochastic simulation of boolean networks for modelling cell differentiation
Villani, Marco;Serra, Roberto
2018
Abstract
Recently a cell differentiation model based on noisy random Boolean networks has been proposed. This mathematical model is able to describe in an elegant way the most relevant features of cell differentiation. Noise plays a key role in this model; the different stages of the differentiation process are emergent dynamical configurations deriving from the control of the intracellular noise level. In this work we compare two approaches to this cell differentiation framework: the first one (already present in the literature) is focused on a network analysis representing the average wandering of the system among its attractors, whereas the second (new) approach takes into consideration the dynamical stories of thousands of individual cells. Results showed that under a particular noise condition the two approaches produce comparable results. Therefore both can be used to model the cell differentiation process in an integrative and complementary manner.File | Dimensione | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|
braccini_pubblicato.pdf
Accesso riservato
Descrizione: Articolo principale
Tipologia:
AAM - Versione dell'autore revisionata e accettata per la pubblicazione
Dimensione
1.1 MB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
1.1 MB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri Richiedi una copia |
Pubblicazioni consigliate
I metadati presenti in IRIS UNIMORE sono rilasciati con licenza Creative Commons CC0 1.0 Universal, mentre i file delle pubblicazioni sono rilasciati con licenza Attribuzione 4.0 Internazionale (CC BY 4.0), salvo diversa indicazione.
In caso di violazione di copyright, contattare Supporto Iris