Implants with rough surfaces are today widely used. It has been speculated that rough surfaces (Ra [ 0.2 lm) provide a better ‘‘substrate’’ for retention and accumulation of plaque in terms of area, thickness and colony- forming unit that can eventually lead to peri mucositis and/or peri-implantitis. The aim of this investigation was to evaluate in vivo the plaque accumulation after 48 h on three implant surfaces with different treatments. For this investigation, we used 21 sterilized titanium disks, with a diameter of 8mm and a thickness of 3 mm, provided by the manufacturer: 7 with machined surface, as smooth control, 7 with HA grit sand- blasted RBM surface and 7 with Ca?? incorporated in tita- nium Xpeed surface. One disk for each surface treatment was characterized at time 0 by SEM and AFM to study, respec- tively, the surface morphology and roughness. The other 18 disks were mounted randomly on three upper acrylic bites in a buccal lateral position, worn for 48 h by three volunteer stu- dents for plaque accumulation. After 48 h each disk was removed and analyzed qualitatively and quantitatively by an independent operator, not involved into the study, in order to avoid bias. Data collected were statistically analyzed by one- way ANOVA. The qualitative analysis showed no differences in terms of total plaque accumulation between the surfaces. Data from quantitative analysis using Anova Test showed no significance between all groups. In this in vivo investigation all the surfaces studied promoted plaque formation. The degree of surface roughness seems not to be a critical factor for plaque accumulation.
Plaque accumulation on titanium disks with different surface treatments: an in vivo investigation / Conserva, Enrico; Generali, Luigi; Bandieri, Alberto; Cavani, Francesco; Borghi, Francesco; Consolo, Ugo. - In: ODONTOLOGY. - ISSN 1618-1247. - 106:(2018), pp. 145-153. [10.1007/s10266-017-0317-2]
Plaque accumulation on titanium disks with different surface treatments: an in vivo investigation
Enrico Conserva;Luigi Generali;Francesco Cavani;Ugo Consolo
2018
Abstract
Implants with rough surfaces are today widely used. It has been speculated that rough surfaces (Ra [ 0.2 lm) provide a better ‘‘substrate’’ for retention and accumulation of plaque in terms of area, thickness and colony- forming unit that can eventually lead to peri mucositis and/or peri-implantitis. The aim of this investigation was to evaluate in vivo the plaque accumulation after 48 h on three implant surfaces with different treatments. For this investigation, we used 21 sterilized titanium disks, with a diameter of 8mm and a thickness of 3 mm, provided by the manufacturer: 7 with machined surface, as smooth control, 7 with HA grit sand- blasted RBM surface and 7 with Ca?? incorporated in tita- nium Xpeed surface. One disk for each surface treatment was characterized at time 0 by SEM and AFM to study, respec- tively, the surface morphology and roughness. The other 18 disks were mounted randomly on three upper acrylic bites in a buccal lateral position, worn for 48 h by three volunteer stu- dents for plaque accumulation. After 48 h each disk was removed and analyzed qualitatively and quantitatively by an independent operator, not involved into the study, in order to avoid bias. Data collected were statistically analyzed by one- way ANOVA. The qualitative analysis showed no differences in terms of total plaque accumulation between the surfaces. Data from quantitative analysis using Anova Test showed no significance between all groups. In this in vivo investigation all the surfaces studied promoted plaque formation. The degree of surface roughness seems not to be a critical factor for plaque accumulation.File | Dimensione | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|
PLAQUE ACCUMULATION ON TITANIUM DISKS.pdf
Accesso riservato
Tipologia:
VOR - Versione pubblicata dall'editore
Dimensione
7.8 MB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
7.8 MB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri Richiedi una copia |
Pubblicazioni consigliate
I metadati presenti in IRIS UNIMORE sono rilasciati con licenza Creative Commons CC0 1.0 Universal, mentre i file delle pubblicazioni sono rilasciati con licenza Attribuzione 4.0 Internazionale (CC BY 4.0), salvo diversa indicazione.
In caso di violazione di copyright, contattare Supporto Iris