The article analyzes a variety of Koshik's (2002) Designedly Incomplete Utterances (DIU) as they are produced in whole-class, teacher-led instruction sequences held in 2 third-year groups in an Italian primary school. This device, one of whose basic pedagogic functions is to solicit displays of knowledge from students in the shape of utterance completion, is a recurrent feature of teacher-student interaction in this setting. The study focuses on one specific and locally managed use of the device, whereby the teacher's orientation to the pedagogic goals of the organization of interaction surfaces in features of talk. I found systematic features in the construction of what I call main-clause DIUs, which teachers recurrently use to cast students as learners, by treating their verbal behavior as providing evidence that some type of learning has occurred in prior talk. The findings provide grounds for a critique of the Initiation-Response-Evaluation model and for a characterization of questioning in instruction sequences, both of which account for the specific institutional relevancies of interaction in this setting. © Taylor & Francis Group, LLC.
On designedly incomplete utterances: What counts as learning for teachers and students in primary classroom interaction / Margutti, Piera. - In: RESEARCH ON LANGUAGE AND SOCIAL INTERACTION. - ISSN 0835-1813. - 43:4(2010), pp. 315-345. [10.1080/08351813.2010.497629]
On designedly incomplete utterances: What counts as learning for teachers and students in primary classroom interaction
Margutti, Piera
2010
Abstract
The article analyzes a variety of Koshik's (2002) Designedly Incomplete Utterances (DIU) as they are produced in whole-class, teacher-led instruction sequences held in 2 third-year groups in an Italian primary school. This device, one of whose basic pedagogic functions is to solicit displays of knowledge from students in the shape of utterance completion, is a recurrent feature of teacher-student interaction in this setting. The study focuses on one specific and locally managed use of the device, whereby the teacher's orientation to the pedagogic goals of the organization of interaction surfaces in features of talk. I found systematic features in the construction of what I call main-clause DIUs, which teachers recurrently use to cast students as learners, by treating their verbal behavior as providing evidence that some type of learning has occurred in prior talk. The findings provide grounds for a critique of the Initiation-Response-Evaluation model and for a characterization of questioning in instruction sequences, both of which account for the specific institutional relevancies of interaction in this setting. © Taylor & Francis Group, LLC.File | Dimensione | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|
PM_ms373_feb10.pdf
Open access
Descrizione: Articolo principale
Tipologia:
Versione originale dell'autore proposta per la pubblicazione
Dimensione
171.6 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
171.6 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri |
08351813.2010.pdf
Accesso riservato
Tipologia:
Versione pubblicata dall'editore
Dimensione
215.24 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
215.24 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri Richiedi una copia |
Pubblicazioni consigliate
I metadati presenti in IRIS UNIMORE sono rilasciati con licenza Creative Commons CC0 1.0 Universal, mentre i file delle pubblicazioni sono rilasciati con licenza Attribuzione 4.0 Internazionale (CC BY 4.0), salvo diversa indicazione.
In caso di violazione di copyright, contattare Supporto Iris