The use of parameters in the descrip- tion of natural language syntax has to balance between the need to discrim- inate among (sometimes subtly dier- ent) languages, which can be seen as a cross-linguistic version of Chomsky's (1964) descriptive adequacy, and the complexity of the acquisition task that a large number of parameters would imply, which is a problem for explana- tory adequacy. Here we present a novel approach in which a machine learning algorithm is used to nd dependencies in a table of parameters. The result is a dependency graph in which some of the parameters can be fully predicted from others. These empirical ndings can be then subjected to linguistic analy- sis, which may either refute them by providing typological counter-examples of languages not included in the origi- nal dataset, dismiss them on theoret- ical grounds, or uphold them as ten- tative empirical laws worth of further study.
Machine Learning Models of Universal Grammar Parameter Dependencies / Kazakov, D.; Cordoni, G.; Ceolin, A.; Irimia, M. -A.; Kim, S. S.; Michelioudakis, D.; Radkevich, N.; Guardiano, C.; Longobardi, G.. - (2017), pp. 31-37. (Intervento presentato al convegno Knowledge Resources for the Socio-Economic Sciences and Humanities associated with RANLP-17 tenutosi a Varna nel September 7, 2017) [10.26615/978-954-452-040-3_005].
Machine Learning Models of Universal Grammar Parameter Dependencies
C. Guardiano;G. Longobardi
2017
Abstract
The use of parameters in the descrip- tion of natural language syntax has to balance between the need to discrim- inate among (sometimes subtly dier- ent) languages, which can be seen as a cross-linguistic version of Chomsky's (1964) descriptive adequacy, and the complexity of the acquisition task that a large number of parameters would imply, which is a problem for explana- tory adequacy. Here we present a novel approach in which a machine learning algorithm is used to nd dependencies in a table of parameters. The result is a dependency graph in which some of the parameters can be fully predicted from others. These empirical ndings can be then subjected to linguistic analy- sis, which may either refute them by providing typological counter-examples of languages not included in the origi- nal dataset, dismiss them on theoret- ical grounds, or uphold them as ten- tative empirical laws worth of further study.File | Dimensione | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|
(2017)learningdependencies-CRC-final.pdf
Accesso riservato
Descrizione: Articolo principale
Tipologia:
Versione pubblicata dall'editore
Dimensione
367.62 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
367.62 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri Richiedi una copia |
Pubblicazioni consigliate
I metadati presenti in IRIS UNIMORE sono rilasciati con licenza Creative Commons CC0 1.0 Universal, mentre i file delle pubblicazioni sono rilasciati con licenza Attribuzione 4.0 Internazionale (CC BY 4.0), salvo diversa indicazione.
In caso di violazione di copyright, contattare Supporto Iris