We evaluate the empirical effectiveness of de facto versus de jure determinants of political power in the U.S. South between the end of the nineteenth and the beginning of the twentieth century. Using previously-unexploited raciallydisaggregated data on voter registration in Mississippi for the years 1896 and 1899, we show that the observed pattern of black political participation is driven by de facto disfranchisement as captured by the presence of a black political majority, which negatively affects black registration. The de jure provisions introduced with the 1890 state constitution and involving literacy tests and poll taxes exert a nonrobust impact. Furthermore, a difference-in-differences approach shows that the decline in aggregate turnout pre-dates the introduction of de jure restrictions and confirms a causal effect of the presence of a black political majority. De jure restrictions intensify the influence of the latter after 1890, which suggests that the main effect of the constitutional reforms may have been an institutionalization of de facto disfranchisement.

De Jure and de Facto Determinants of Power: Evidence from Mississippi / Bertocchi, Graziella; Dimico, Arcangelo. - In: CONSTITUTIONAL POLITICAL ECONOMY. - ISSN 1043-4062. - 28:4(2017), pp. 321-345. [10.1007/s10602-017-9239-9]

De Jure and de Facto Determinants of Power: Evidence from Mississippi

Graziella Bertocchi
;
2017

Abstract

We evaluate the empirical effectiveness of de facto versus de jure determinants of political power in the U.S. South between the end of the nineteenth and the beginning of the twentieth century. Using previously-unexploited raciallydisaggregated data on voter registration in Mississippi for the years 1896 and 1899, we show that the observed pattern of black political participation is driven by de facto disfranchisement as captured by the presence of a black political majority, which negatively affects black registration. The de jure provisions introduced with the 1890 state constitution and involving literacy tests and poll taxes exert a nonrobust impact. Furthermore, a difference-in-differences approach shows that the decline in aggregate turnout pre-dates the introduction of de jure restrictions and confirms a causal effect of the presence of a black political majority. De jure restrictions intensify the influence of the latter after 1890, which suggests that the main effect of the constitutional reforms may have been an institutionalization of de facto disfranchisement.
2017
feb-2017
28
4
321
345
De Jure and de Facto Determinants of Power: Evidence from Mississippi / Bertocchi, Graziella; Dimico, Arcangelo. - In: CONSTITUTIONAL POLITICAL ECONOMY. - ISSN 1043-4062. - 28:4(2017), pp. 321-345. [10.1007/s10602-017-9239-9]
Bertocchi, Graziella; Dimico, Arcangelo
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
mississippiweb.pdf

Accesso riservato

Descrizione: Articolo principale
Tipologia: Versione dell'autore revisionata e accettata per la pubblicazione
Dimensione 246.19 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
246.19 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia
Pubblicazioni consigliate

Licenza Creative Commons
I metadati presenti in IRIS UNIMORE sono rilasciati con licenza Creative Commons CC0 1.0 Universal, mentre i file delle pubblicazioni sono rilasciati con licenza Attribuzione 4.0 Internazionale (CC BY 4.0), salvo diversa indicazione.
In caso di violazione di copyright, contattare Supporto Iris

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11380/1147284
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 4
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 8
social impact