The project investigates the possible membership of the principle of "sovereignty of the budget" to the category of so-called "Supreme constitutional principles". Highlighted the ambiguity and the common reference to the assessments "material" of the two concepts, it is necessary to define them stipulative: for 'supreme principle' will be considered (only) those provisions excluded from the possibility of constitutional change; for 'fiscal sovereignty' would seem appropriate to refer to a power not absolute, but limited in the subject in question. An analysis of recent decisions of the Bundesverfassungsgericht, on one hand confirms the connection between the "sovereignty of the budget" and the supreme democratic and social principles, but on the other side it shows how to identify the "core" of the matter removed from the legitimate possibility of constitutional revision clashes with the difficulty of finding clear application standards for economic evaluation formulas set out in the case law. The essay investigates the causes of these difficulties and it indicates some possible solutions, which may reconcile the judgment of the constitutionality with the discretional spaces of the legislature.
La sovranità “limitata” di bilancio come principio supremo. Primi appunti su due concetti ambigui a margine della recente giurisprudenza costituzionale tedesca / Pedrini, Federico. - (2015), pp. 197-213.
La sovranità “limitata” di bilancio come principio supremo. Primi appunti su due concetti ambigui a margine della recente giurisprudenza costituzionale tedesca
Pedrini, Federico
2015
Abstract
The project investigates the possible membership of the principle of "sovereignty of the budget" to the category of so-called "Supreme constitutional principles". Highlighted the ambiguity and the common reference to the assessments "material" of the two concepts, it is necessary to define them stipulative: for 'supreme principle' will be considered (only) those provisions excluded from the possibility of constitutional change; for 'fiscal sovereignty' would seem appropriate to refer to a power not absolute, but limited in the subject in question. An analysis of recent decisions of the Bundesverfassungsgericht, on one hand confirms the connection between the "sovereignty of the budget" and the supreme democratic and social principles, but on the other side it shows how to identify the "core" of the matter removed from the legitimate possibility of constitutional revision clashes with the difficulty of finding clear application standards for economic evaluation formulas set out in the case law. The essay investigates the causes of these difficulties and it indicates some possible solutions, which may reconcile the judgment of the constitutionality with the discretional spaces of the legislature.File | Dimensione | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|
2015_La sovranita (limitata) di bilancio come principio supremo.pdf
Accesso riservato
Tipologia:
Versione pubblicata dall'editore
Dimensione
411.87 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
411.87 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri Richiedi una copia |
Pubblicazioni consigliate
I metadati presenti in IRIS UNIMORE sono rilasciati con licenza Creative Commons CC0 1.0 Universal, mentre i file delle pubblicazioni sono rilasciati con licenza Attribuzione 4.0 Internazionale (CC BY 4.0), salvo diversa indicazione.
In caso di violazione di copyright, contattare Supporto Iris