In urology, the main use for the robotic technique has been in radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer. Robotic surgery for other organs, such as the kidneys and bladder, has been less explored. However, partial nephrectomy or radical nephroureterectomy can be difficult for inexperienced laparoscopic surgeons. The advent of the da Vinci robot, with multijointed endowristed instruments and stereoscopic vision, decreases the technical difficulty of intracorporeal suturing and improves the reconstructive steps. The objective of this article is to offer an overview of all robotic procedures recently developed in the field of urology. We evaluate the feasibility of these procedures and their potential advantages and disadvantages. We also describe perioperative, postoperative, and oncologic outcomes of robot-assisted surgery as well as perform a comparison with open and laparoscopic techniques. Comparative data and an adequate follow-up are needed to demonstrate equivalent oncologic outcomes in comparison with traditional open or laparoscopic procedures. Copyright:

Robotics in uro-oncologic surgery / E., De Lorenzis; C., Palumbo; G., Cozzi; M., Talso; M., Rosso; B., Costa; F., Gadda; Rocco, Bernardo Maria Cesare. - In: ECANCERMEDICALSCIENCE. - ISSN 1754-6605. - 7:1(2013), pp. 354.354.1-354.354.11. [10.3332/ecancer.2013.354]

Robotics in uro-oncologic surgery

ROCCO, Bernardo Maria Cesare
2013

Abstract

In urology, the main use for the robotic technique has been in radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer. Robotic surgery for other organs, such as the kidneys and bladder, has been less explored. However, partial nephrectomy or radical nephroureterectomy can be difficult for inexperienced laparoscopic surgeons. The advent of the da Vinci robot, with multijointed endowristed instruments and stereoscopic vision, decreases the technical difficulty of intracorporeal suturing and improves the reconstructive steps. The objective of this article is to offer an overview of all robotic procedures recently developed in the field of urology. We evaluate the feasibility of these procedures and their potential advantages and disadvantages. We also describe perioperative, postoperative, and oncologic outcomes of robot-assisted surgery as well as perform a comparison with open and laparoscopic techniques. Comparative data and an adequate follow-up are needed to demonstrate equivalent oncologic outcomes in comparison with traditional open or laparoscopic procedures. Copyright:
2013
7
1
354.1
354.11
Robotics in uro-oncologic surgery / E., De Lorenzis; C., Palumbo; G., Cozzi; M., Talso; M., Rosso; B., Costa; F., Gadda; Rocco, Bernardo Maria Cesare. - In: ECANCERMEDICALSCIENCE. - ISSN 1754-6605. - 7:1(2013), pp. 354.354.1-354.354.11. [10.3332/ecancer.2013.354]
E., De Lorenzis; C., Palumbo; G., Cozzi; M., Talso; M., Rosso; B., Costa; F., Gadda; Rocco, Bernardo Maria Cesare
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
ecancermedicalscience-2013-article-354.pdf

Open access

Tipologia: Versione pubblicata dall'editore
Dimensione 401.32 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
401.32 kB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri
Pubblicazioni consigliate

Licenza Creative Commons
I metadati presenti in IRIS UNIMORE sono rilasciati con licenza Creative Commons CC0 1.0 Universal, mentre i file delle pubblicazioni sono rilasciati con licenza Attribuzione 4.0 Internazionale (CC BY 4.0), salvo diversa indicazione.
In caso di violazione di copyright, contattare Supporto Iris

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11380/1128676
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 2
  • Scopus 10
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact