The aim of this study was to determine if severity assessment tools (general severity of illness and community-acquired pneumonia specific scores) can be used to guide decisions for patients admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) due to pandemic influenza A pneumonia. A prospective, observational, multicentre study included 265 patients with a mean age of 42 (±16.1) years and an ICU mortality of 31.7%. On admission to the ICU, the mean pneumonia severity index (PSI) score was 103.2 ± 43.2 points, the CURB-65 score was 1.7 ± 1.1 points and the PIRO-CAP score was 3.2 ± 1.5 points. None of the scores had a good predictive ability: area under the ROC for PSI, 0.72 (95% CI, 0.65-0.78); CURB-65, 0.67 (95% CI, 0.59-0.74); and PIRO-CAP, 0.64 (95% CI, 0.56-0.71). The PSI score (OR, 1.022 (1.009-1.034), p 0.001) was independently associated with ICU mortality; however, none of the three scores, when used at ICU admission, were able to reliably detect a low-risk group of patients. Low risk for mortality was identified in 27.5% of patients using PIRO-CAP, but above 40% when using PSI (I-III) or CURB65 (<2). Observed mortality was 13.7%, 13.5% and 19.4%, respectively. Pneumonia-specific scores undervalued severity and should not be used as instruments to guide decisions in the ICU.

Severity assessment tools in ICU patients with 2009 influenza A (H1N1) pneumonia / Pereira, J. M; Moreno, R. P; Matos, R; Rhodes, A; Martin Loeches, I; Cecconi, M; Lisboa, T; Rello, J.. - In: CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY AND INFECTION. - ISSN 1469-0691. - 18:10(2012), pp. 1040-1048. [10.1111/j.1469-0691.2011.03736.x]

Severity assessment tools in ICU patients with 2009 influenza A (H1N1) pneumonia

2012

Abstract

The aim of this study was to determine if severity assessment tools (general severity of illness and community-acquired pneumonia specific scores) can be used to guide decisions for patients admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) due to pandemic influenza A pneumonia. A prospective, observational, multicentre study included 265 patients with a mean age of 42 (±16.1) years and an ICU mortality of 31.7%. On admission to the ICU, the mean pneumonia severity index (PSI) score was 103.2 ± 43.2 points, the CURB-65 score was 1.7 ± 1.1 points and the PIRO-CAP score was 3.2 ± 1.5 points. None of the scores had a good predictive ability: area under the ROC for PSI, 0.72 (95% CI, 0.65-0.78); CURB-65, 0.67 (95% CI, 0.59-0.74); and PIRO-CAP, 0.64 (95% CI, 0.56-0.71). The PSI score (OR, 1.022 (1.009-1.034), p 0.001) was independently associated with ICU mortality; however, none of the three scores, when used at ICU admission, were able to reliably detect a low-risk group of patients. Low risk for mortality was identified in 27.5% of patients using PIRO-CAP, but above 40% when using PSI (I-III) or CURB65 (<2). Observed mortality was 13.7%, 13.5% and 19.4%, respectively. Pneumonia-specific scores undervalued severity and should not be used as instruments to guide decisions in the ICU.
2012
18
10
1040
1048
Severity assessment tools in ICU patients with 2009 influenza A (H1N1) pneumonia / Pereira, J. M; Moreno, R. P; Matos, R; Rhodes, A; Martin Loeches, I; Cecconi, M; Lisboa, T; Rello, J.. - In: CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY AND INFECTION. - ISSN 1469-0691. - 18:10(2012), pp. 1040-1048. [10.1111/j.1469-0691.2011.03736.x]
Pereira, J. M; Moreno, R. P; Matos, R; Rhodes, A; Martin Loeches, I; Cecconi, M; Lisboa, T; Rello, J.
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
pereiraClinMicro2012-SeverityH1N1.pdf

Open access

Tipologia: VOR - Versione pubblicata dall'editore
Dimensione 186.87 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
186.87 kB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri
Pubblicazioni consigliate

Licenza Creative Commons
I metadati presenti in IRIS UNIMORE sono rilasciati con licenza Creative Commons CC0 1.0 Universal, mentre i file delle pubblicazioni sono rilasciati con licenza Attribuzione 4.0 Internazionale (CC BY 4.0), salvo diversa indicazione.
In caso di violazione di copyright, contattare Supporto Iris

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11380/1117628
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 15
  • Scopus 33
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 28
social impact