Study Objective: To compare single-incision mini-slings (SIMSs) and retropubic tension-free vaginal tape (r-TVT) in terms of the long-term efficacy and safety for the treatment of female stress (SUI) or mixed urinary incontinence (MUI). Design: Prospective multicenter cohort trial (registration number NCT00751088) (Canadian Task Force II). Settings: Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Italy. Patients: Two hundred-forty women with SUI/MUI. Interventions: SIMS or r-TVT. Measurements and Main Results: The operative time and the use of analgesic tablets were significantly (p < .001) higher and lower, respectively, in the r-TVT group versus the SIMS group. After 24 months of follow-up, no difference between the study arms was observed in terms of the complication rate (30/120 [25%] vs 19/120 [15.8%] for the r-TVT and SIMS arms, respectively; relative risk = 1.58; 95% confidence interval, 0.94-2.65; p = .083), whereas the subjective cure rate was significantly lower in the SIMS arm than in the r-TVT arm (57/103 [55.3%] vs 89/106 [84.0%] for the r-TVT and SIMS arms, respectively; relative risk = 0.66; 95% confidence interval, 0.54-0.80]; p < .001). The proportion of retreated patients for SUI/MUI was significantly higher in the SIMS arm than in the r-TVT arm (37/103 [34.9%] vs 12/106 [11.3%] for SIMS and r-TVT arm, respectively; p < .001). Conclusion: SIMS has no advantage in terms of safety over r-TVT and was found to be less effective than r-TVT. Thus, its use in the clinical practice should be questioned. © 2014 AAGL.
Single-incision Mini-slings Versus Retropubic Tension-free Vaginal Tapes: A Multicenter Clinical Trial / Palomba, Stefano; Oppedisano, Rosamaria; Falbo, Angela; Torella, Marco; Maiorana, Antonino; Materazzo, Caterina; Tolino, Achille; Mastrantonio, Pasquale; La Sala, Giovanni Battista; Alio, Luigi; Colacurci, Nicola; Zullo, Fulvio. - In: JOURNAL OF MINIMALLY INVASIVE GYNECOLOGY. - ISSN 1553-4650. - 21:2(2014), pp. 303-310. [10.1016/j.jmig.2013.08.714]
Single-incision Mini-slings Versus Retropubic Tension-free Vaginal Tapes: A Multicenter Clinical Trial
Palomba, Stefano;MAIORANA, Antonino;LA SALA, Giovanni Battista;
2014
Abstract
Study Objective: To compare single-incision mini-slings (SIMSs) and retropubic tension-free vaginal tape (r-TVT) in terms of the long-term efficacy and safety for the treatment of female stress (SUI) or mixed urinary incontinence (MUI). Design: Prospective multicenter cohort trial (registration number NCT00751088) (Canadian Task Force II). Settings: Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Italy. Patients: Two hundred-forty women with SUI/MUI. Interventions: SIMS or r-TVT. Measurements and Main Results: The operative time and the use of analgesic tablets were significantly (p < .001) higher and lower, respectively, in the r-TVT group versus the SIMS group. After 24 months of follow-up, no difference between the study arms was observed in terms of the complication rate (30/120 [25%] vs 19/120 [15.8%] for the r-TVT and SIMS arms, respectively; relative risk = 1.58; 95% confidence interval, 0.94-2.65; p = .083), whereas the subjective cure rate was significantly lower in the SIMS arm than in the r-TVT arm (57/103 [55.3%] vs 89/106 [84.0%] for the r-TVT and SIMS arms, respectively; relative risk = 0.66; 95% confidence interval, 0.54-0.80]; p < .001). The proportion of retreated patients for SUI/MUI was significantly higher in the SIMS arm than in the r-TVT arm (37/103 [34.9%] vs 12/106 [11.3%] for SIMS and r-TVT arm, respectively; p < .001). Conclusion: SIMS has no advantage in terms of safety over r-TVT and was found to be less effective than r-TVT. Thus, its use in the clinical practice should be questioned. © 2014 AAGL.File | Dimensione | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|
Palomba S 2014 L Minim Invasive Gynecol.pdf
Accesso riservato
Tipologia:
Versione pubblicata dall'editore
Dimensione
379.02 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
379.02 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri Richiedi una copia |
Pubblicazioni consigliate
I metadati presenti in IRIS UNIMORE sono rilasciati con licenza Creative Commons CC0 1.0 Universal, mentre i file delle pubblicazioni sono rilasciati con licenza Attribuzione 4.0 Internazionale (CC BY 4.0), salvo diversa indicazione.
In caso di violazione di copyright, contattare Supporto Iris