Actinic keratosis (AK) is a common skin disease which can potentially progress to invasive squamous cell carcinoma (iSCC). Given that mortality rates and health-care cost associated with iSCC are substantial, the management of AK represents an important public health issue. Several effective lesion-directed and field-directed treatments are available. Ablative procedures (e.g. cryosurgery, excision, laser ablation, curettage alone or with electrodessication) are considered cost-effective options for solitary lesions. Field-directed therapies (e.g. Ingenol Mebutate, imiquimod, PDT, 5-Fluorouracile, diclofenac 3%, 5-FU + Salicylic acid) can be used over large epidermal surfaces and are directed to treat both individual visible lesions and cancerization fields. In order to provide guidance for management choice in clinical practice, several guidelines concerning the diagnosis and treatment of AK have been published in the past decade. However, the introduction of novel therapeutic options requires continuous updates of recommendations and adaptation to national contexts. The present review summarizes the existing evidence and reports the results of a consensus workshop on the management of AK.

Italian expert consensus for the management of actinic keratosis in immunocompetent patients / Peris, K; Calzavara Pinton, P. G; Neri, L; Girolomoni, G; Malara, G; Parodi, A; Piaserico, S; Rossi, R; Pellacani, Giovanni. - In: JOURNAL OF THE EUROPEAN ACADEMY OF DERMATOLOGY AND VENEREOLOGY. - ISSN 1468-3083. - STAMPA. - 30:(2016), pp. 1077-1084. [10.1111/jdv.13648]

Italian expert consensus for the management of actinic keratosis in immunocompetent patients

PELLACANI, Giovanni
2016

Abstract

Actinic keratosis (AK) is a common skin disease which can potentially progress to invasive squamous cell carcinoma (iSCC). Given that mortality rates and health-care cost associated with iSCC are substantial, the management of AK represents an important public health issue. Several effective lesion-directed and field-directed treatments are available. Ablative procedures (e.g. cryosurgery, excision, laser ablation, curettage alone or with electrodessication) are considered cost-effective options for solitary lesions. Field-directed therapies (e.g. Ingenol Mebutate, imiquimod, PDT, 5-Fluorouracile, diclofenac 3%, 5-FU + Salicylic acid) can be used over large epidermal surfaces and are directed to treat both individual visible lesions and cancerization fields. In order to provide guidance for management choice in clinical practice, several guidelines concerning the diagnosis and treatment of AK have been published in the past decade. However, the introduction of novel therapeutic options requires continuous updates of recommendations and adaptation to national contexts. The present review summarizes the existing evidence and reports the results of a consensus workshop on the management of AK.
2016
6-apr-2016
30
1077
1084
Italian expert consensus for the management of actinic keratosis in immunocompetent patients / Peris, K; Calzavara Pinton, P. G; Neri, L; Girolomoni, G; Malara, G; Parodi, A; Piaserico, S; Rossi, R; Pellacani, Giovanni. - In: JOURNAL OF THE EUROPEAN ACADEMY OF DERMATOLOGY AND VENEREOLOGY. - ISSN 1468-3083. - STAMPA. - 30:(2016), pp. 1077-1084. [10.1111/jdv.13648]
Peris, K; Calzavara Pinton, P. G; Neri, L; Girolomoni, G; Malara, G; Parodi, A; Piaserico, S; Rossi, R; Pellacani, Giovanni
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
peris2016.pdf

Accesso riservato

Tipologia: Versione pubblicata dall'editore
Dimensione 144.84 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
144.84 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia
Pubblicazioni consigliate

Licenza Creative Commons
I metadati presenti in IRIS UNIMORE sono rilasciati con licenza Creative Commons CC0 1.0 Universal, mentre i file delle pubblicazioni sono rilasciati con licenza Attribuzione 4.0 Internazionale (CC BY 4.0), salvo diversa indicazione.
In caso di violazione di copyright, contattare Supporto Iris

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11380/1107858
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 8
  • Scopus 40
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 38
social impact