AIM OF THE STUDY: To report a matched-pair comparative analysis between open (OPN) and laparoscopic partial nephrectomy (LPN) for clinical (c) T1a renal masses from a large prospective multicenter dataset. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The RECORd Project includes all patients who underwent OPN and LPN for kidney cancer between January 2009 and January 2011 at 19 Italian centers. Open and laparoscopic groups were compared regarding clinical, surgical, pathologic, functional results and TRIFECTA outcome. Multivariable logistic regression models were used to analyze predictors of WIT >25 min, surgical complications (SC) and the achievement of the TRIFECTA outcome. RESULTS: Overall, 301 patients had OPN and 149 LPN. Groups were matched 1:1 (140 matched pairs) for clinical diameter, tumor location and type of indication. Laparoscopic partial nephrectomy was associated with a significantly mean longer WIT (19.9 vs. 15.1 min; p < 0.001), and it was an independent predictor of a WIT >25 min (RR 6.29, p < 0.0001). The TRIFECTA was achieved in 78.6 and 74.3% after OPN and LPN (p = ns), respectively, and the surgical approach was not a predictor of a negative TRIFECTA and SC at multivariable analysis. At 6-month follow-up, no significant differences were observed between the OPN and LPN group both in estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) (∆GFR 1.1 vs. 4.1 mL/min) and in new-onset stage III-V chronic kidney disease (CKD) rate (0 vs. 0.7%). CONCLUSION: No significant difference in achieving the TRIFECTA outcome was reported after OPN and LPN. LPN was associated with a significantly longer WIT. However, eGFR at 6-month follow-up did not differ significantly between the two surgical approaches.

Open versus laparoscopic partial nephrectomy for clinical T1a renal masses: A matched-pair comparison of 280 patients with TRIFECTA outcomes (RECORd Project) / Minervini, Andrea; Siena, Giampaolo; Antonelli, Alessandro; Bianchi, Giampaolo; Bocciardi, Aldo Massimo; Cosciani Cunico, Sergio; Ficarra, Vincenzo; Fiori, Cristian; Fusco, Ferdinando; Mari, Andrea; Martorana, Giuseppe; Medica, Mauro; Mirone, Vincenzo; Morgia, Giuseppe; Porpiglia, Francesco; Rocco, Francesco; Rovereto, Bruno; Schiavina, Riccardo; Simeone, Claudio; Terrone, Carlo; Volpe, Alessandro; Carini, Marco; Serni, Sergio. - In: WORLD JOURNAL OF UROLOGY. - ISSN 0724-4983. - 32(2014), pp. 257-263. [10.1007/s00345-013-1155-7]

Open versus laparoscopic partial nephrectomy for clinical T1a renal masses: A matched-pair comparison of 280 patients with TRIFECTA outcomes (RECORd Project)

BIANCHI, Giampaolo;
2014

Abstract

AIM OF THE STUDY: To report a matched-pair comparative analysis between open (OPN) and laparoscopic partial nephrectomy (LPN) for clinical (c) T1a renal masses from a large prospective multicenter dataset. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The RECORd Project includes all patients who underwent OPN and LPN for kidney cancer between January 2009 and January 2011 at 19 Italian centers. Open and laparoscopic groups were compared regarding clinical, surgical, pathologic, functional results and TRIFECTA outcome. Multivariable logistic regression models were used to analyze predictors of WIT >25 min, surgical complications (SC) and the achievement of the TRIFECTA outcome. RESULTS: Overall, 301 patients had OPN and 149 LPN. Groups were matched 1:1 (140 matched pairs) for clinical diameter, tumor location and type of indication. Laparoscopic partial nephrectomy was associated with a significantly mean longer WIT (19.9 vs. 15.1 min; p < 0.001), and it was an independent predictor of a WIT >25 min (RR 6.29, p < 0.0001). The TRIFECTA was achieved in 78.6 and 74.3% after OPN and LPN (p = ns), respectively, and the surgical approach was not a predictor of a negative TRIFECTA and SC at multivariable analysis. At 6-month follow-up, no significant differences were observed between the OPN and LPN group both in estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) (∆GFR 1.1 vs. 4.1 mL/min) and in new-onset stage III-V chronic kidney disease (CKD) rate (0 vs. 0.7%). CONCLUSION: No significant difference in achieving the TRIFECTA outcome was reported after OPN and LPN. LPN was associated with a significantly longer WIT. However, eGFR at 6-month follow-up did not differ significantly between the two surgical approaches.
32
257
263
Open versus laparoscopic partial nephrectomy for clinical T1a renal masses: A matched-pair comparison of 280 patients with TRIFECTA outcomes (RECORd Project) / Minervini, Andrea; Siena, Giampaolo; Antonelli, Alessandro; Bianchi, Giampaolo; Bocciardi, Aldo Massimo; Cosciani Cunico, Sergio; Ficarra, Vincenzo; Fiori, Cristian; Fusco, Ferdinando; Mari, Andrea; Martorana, Giuseppe; Medica, Mauro; Mirone, Vincenzo; Morgia, Giuseppe; Porpiglia, Francesco; Rocco, Francesco; Rovereto, Bruno; Schiavina, Riccardo; Simeone, Claudio; Terrone, Carlo; Volpe, Alessandro; Carini, Marco; Serni, Sergio. - In: WORLD JOURNAL OF UROLOGY. - ISSN 0724-4983. - 32(2014), pp. 257-263. [10.1007/s00345-013-1155-7]
Minervini, Andrea; Siena, Giampaolo; Antonelli, Alessandro; Bianchi, Giampaolo; Bocciardi, Aldo Massimo; Cosciani Cunico, Sergio; Ficarra, Vincenzo; Fiori, Cristian; Fusco, Ferdinando; Mari, Andrea; Martorana, Giuseppe; Medica, Mauro; Mirone, Vincenzo; Morgia, Giuseppe; Porpiglia, Francesco; Rocco, Francesco; Rovereto, Bruno; Schiavina, Riccardo; Simeone, Claudio; Terrone, Carlo; Volpe, Alessandro; Carini, Marco; Serni, Sergio
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.
Pubblicazioni consigliate

Caricamento pubblicazioni consigliate

Licenza Creative Commons
I metadati presenti in IRIS UNIMORE sono rilasciati con licenza Creative Commons CC0 1.0 Universal, mentre i file delle pubblicazioni sono rilasciati con licenza Attribuzione 4.0 Internazionale (CC BY 4.0), salvo diversa indicazione.
In caso di violazione di copyright, contattare Supporto Iris

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: http://hdl.handle.net/11380/1080118
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 12
  • Scopus 43
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 46
social impact