This study aimed to compare two different classifications of the risk of fracture/osteoporosis (OP) based on quantitative ultrasound (QUS). Analyses were based on data from the Epidemiological Study on the Prevalence of Osteoporosis, a cross-sectional study conducted in 2000 aimed at assessing the risk of OP in a representative sample of the Italian population. Subjects were classified into 5 groups considering the cross-classification found in previous studies; logistic regression models were defined separately for women and men to study the fracture risk attributable to groups defined by the cross-classification, adjusting for traditional risk factors. Eight-thousand six-hundred eighty-one subjects were considered in the analyses. Logistic regression models revealed that the two classifications seem to be able to identify a common core of individuals at low and at high risk of fractures, and the importance of a multidimensional assessment in older patients to evaluate clinical risk factors together with a simple, inexpensive, radiation-free device such as QUS.

Quantitative ultrasound criteria for risk stratification in clinical practice: a comparative assessment / Accardi, A., Angeli, A., Baglio, S., Baldoncini, A., Ballardini, P., Bancheri, C., Beghe, F., Bernini, L., Bevilacqua, M., Bianchi, G., Bonomi, G., Bottai, M., Brogi, G., Candioto, G., Candiotto, S., Cecchetti, R., Serqua, R., Cervelli, S., Coaccioli, S., Coin, F., et al.. - In: ULTRASOUND IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY. - ISSN 0301-5629. - 38:7(2012), pp. 1138-1144. [10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2012.02.022]

Quantitative ultrasound criteria for risk stratification in clinical practice: a comparative assessment

SALVARANI, CARLO;
2012

Abstract

This study aimed to compare two different classifications of the risk of fracture/osteoporosis (OP) based on quantitative ultrasound (QUS). Analyses were based on data from the Epidemiological Study on the Prevalence of Osteoporosis, a cross-sectional study conducted in 2000 aimed at assessing the risk of OP in a representative sample of the Italian population. Subjects were classified into 5 groups considering the cross-classification found in previous studies; logistic regression models were defined separately for women and men to study the fracture risk attributable to groups defined by the cross-classification, adjusting for traditional risk factors. Eight-thousand six-hundred eighty-one subjects were considered in the analyses. Logistic regression models revealed that the two classifications seem to be able to identify a common core of individuals at low and at high risk of fractures, and the importance of a multidimensional assessment in older patients to evaluate clinical risk factors together with a simple, inexpensive, radiation-free device such as QUS.
2012
38
7
1138
1144
Quantitative ultrasound criteria for risk stratification in clinical practice: a comparative assessment / Accardi, A., Angeli, A., Baglio, S., Baldoncini, A., Ballardini, P., Bancheri, C., Beghe, F., Bernini, L., Bevilacqua, M., Bianchi, G., Bonomi, G., Bottai, M., Brogi, G., Candioto, G., Candiotto, S., Cecchetti, R., Serqua, R., Cervelli, S., Coaccioli, S., Coin, F., et al.. - In: ULTRASOUND IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY. - ISSN 0301-5629. - 38:7(2012), pp. 1138-1144. [10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2012.02.022]
Accardi, A; Angeli, A; Baglio, S; Baldoncini, A; Ballardini, P; Bancheri, C; Beghe, F; Bernini, L; Bevilacqua, M; Bianchi, G; Bonomi, G; Bottai, M; Br...espandi
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.
Pubblicazioni consigliate

Licenza Creative Commons
I metadati presenti in IRIS UNIMORE sono rilasciati con licenza Creative Commons CC0 1.0 Universal, mentre i file delle pubblicazioni sono rilasciati con licenza Attribuzione 4.0 Internazionale (CC BY 4.0), salvo diversa indicazione.
In caso di violazione di copyright, contattare Supporto Iris

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11380/1078894
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 2
  • Scopus 3
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 3
social impact