Objective: Digital ulcers (DU) may develop in half of systemic sclerosis (SSc) patients; they are often resistant to treatments. Deep wound debridement is crucial for DU healing, but very difficult to carry out without adequate procedural pain management. Here, we report the results of our experience on procedural pain management in scleroderma DU. Methods: The study included 51 DU observed in 32 consecutive SSc patients; procedural pain was treated following a definite schedule: local lidocaine and prilocaine (25 mg of either agent per gram of cream, EMLA 5%) were initially used in all cases, followed by local and oral morphine, according to the severity of pain scored on a 10 cm visual analogue scale (VAS). Results: At baseline, higher pain VAS was recorded in more severe (p=0.0001) and/or infected DU (p=0.0001). Good compliance to DU debridement was observed in patients with mild pain (VAS ≤4) treated with only EMLA, and in 5 cases with moderate-severe pain (VAS >4) at baseline. While, the majority of DU with moderate-severe pain (34/39) needed a combined therapy with EMLA and local morphine (8/34) or with EMLA, local and oral morphine (26/34). On the whole, pain management during DU debridement required only EMLA application in 33% of cases, EMLA plus local morphine in 16%, while combined EMLA, local and oral morphine were necessary in 51%, generally with more severe and/or infected lesions. Conclusion: The present study showed valuable control of procedural pain during DU debridement with sequential, combined analgesic treatment.

Procedural pain management in the treatment of scleroderma digital ulcers / Giuggioli, Dilia; Manfredi, Andreina Teresa; Vacchi, Caterina; Sebastiani, Marco; Spinella, Amelia; Ferri, Clodoveo. - In: CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL RHEUMATOLOGY. - ISSN 0392-856X. - STAMPA. - 33:1(2015), pp. 5-10.

Procedural pain management in the treatment of scleroderma digital ulcers

GIUGGIOLI, DILIA;MANFREDI, Andreina Teresa;VACCHI, CATERINA;SEBASTIANI, Marco;SPINELLA, AMELIA;FERRI, Clodoveo
2015

Abstract

Objective: Digital ulcers (DU) may develop in half of systemic sclerosis (SSc) patients; they are often resistant to treatments. Deep wound debridement is crucial for DU healing, but very difficult to carry out without adequate procedural pain management. Here, we report the results of our experience on procedural pain management in scleroderma DU. Methods: The study included 51 DU observed in 32 consecutive SSc patients; procedural pain was treated following a definite schedule: local lidocaine and prilocaine (25 mg of either agent per gram of cream, EMLA 5%) were initially used in all cases, followed by local and oral morphine, according to the severity of pain scored on a 10 cm visual analogue scale (VAS). Results: At baseline, higher pain VAS was recorded in more severe (p=0.0001) and/or infected DU (p=0.0001). Good compliance to DU debridement was observed in patients with mild pain (VAS ≤4) treated with only EMLA, and in 5 cases with moderate-severe pain (VAS >4) at baseline. While, the majority of DU with moderate-severe pain (34/39) needed a combined therapy with EMLA and local morphine (8/34) or with EMLA, local and oral morphine (26/34). On the whole, pain management during DU debridement required only EMLA application in 33% of cases, EMLA plus local morphine in 16%, while combined EMLA, local and oral morphine were necessary in 51%, generally with more severe and/or infected lesions. Conclusion: The present study showed valuable control of procedural pain during DU debridement with sequential, combined analgesic treatment.
22-dic-2014
33
1
5
10
Procedural pain management in the treatment of scleroderma digital ulcers / Giuggioli, Dilia; Manfredi, Andreina Teresa; Vacchi, Caterina; Sebastiani, Marco; Spinella, Amelia; Ferri, Clodoveo. - In: CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL RHEUMATOLOGY. - ISSN 0392-856X. - STAMPA. - 33:1(2015), pp. 5-10.
Giuggioli, Dilia; Manfredi, Andreina Teresa; Vacchi, Caterina; Sebastiani, Marco; Spinella, Amelia; Ferri, Clodoveo
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
article (2).pdf

non disponibili

Tipologia: Versione dell'editore (versione pubblicata)
Dimensione 541.87 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
541.87 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia
Pubblicazioni consigliate

Caricamento pubblicazioni consigliate

Licenza Creative Commons
I metadati presenti in IRIS UNIMORE sono rilasciati con licenza Creative Commons CC0 1.0 Universal, mentre i file delle pubblicazioni sono rilasciati con licenza Attribuzione 4.0 Internazionale (CC BY 4.0), salvo diversa indicazione.
In caso di violazione di copyright, contattare Supporto Iris

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: http://hdl.handle.net/11380/1074417
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 6
  • Scopus 16
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 15
social impact