Aim: After implant-insertion, bone tissue, newly-formed on peri-implant crest, undergoes to a mild marginal osseous readjustment due to build-up of inflammatory cell tissue (ICT). The present study verifies the possibility to limit bone resorption by placing implant fixtures 0.5 mm outside cortical bone edge. Methods: A clinically-controlled randomized study on 100 implants has been performed to compare early resorption process of implant fixtures placed 0.5 mm outside cortical bone edge with implant-fixtures inserted according to juxtacortical bone conventional protocols. Results: After 6 months, bone implant level was higher with emersion approach (-1.01±0.54 mm, mean±SD) than with submerged treatment (-1.56±0.5 mm) (P<0.001). Conclusion: Factors to achieve an excellent result at mean-long term seem to be very good, even though the latter have to be confirmed by follow-up.
Reduction of precocious peri-implant resorption cone / De Santis, D; Zanotti, G; Morandini, S; Bordanzi, A; Gerosa, R; Rodella, Lf; Rossetto, A; Chiarini, Luigi; Nocini, Pf; Bertossi, D.. - In: MINERVA STOMATOLOGICA. - ISSN 0026-4970. - ELETTRONICO. - 62:8(2013), pp. 19-26.
Reduction of precocious peri-implant resorption cone
CHIARINI, Luigi;
2013
Abstract
Aim: After implant-insertion, bone tissue, newly-formed on peri-implant crest, undergoes to a mild marginal osseous readjustment due to build-up of inflammatory cell tissue (ICT). The present study verifies the possibility to limit bone resorption by placing implant fixtures 0.5 mm outside cortical bone edge. Methods: A clinically-controlled randomized study on 100 implants has been performed to compare early resorption process of implant fixtures placed 0.5 mm outside cortical bone edge with implant-fixtures inserted according to juxtacortical bone conventional protocols. Results: After 6 months, bone implant level was higher with emersion approach (-1.01±0.54 mm, mean±SD) than with submerged treatment (-1.56±0.5 mm) (P<0.001). Conclusion: Factors to achieve an excellent result at mean-long term seem to be very good, even though the latter have to be confirmed by follow-up.File | Dimensione | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|
2003 peri-implant resorption cone.pdf
Solo gestori archivio
Tipologia:
Versione pubblicata dall'editore
Dimensione
128.67 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
128.67 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri Richiedi una copia |
Pubblicazioni consigliate
I metadati presenti in IRIS UNIMORE sono rilasciati con licenza Creative Commons CC0 1.0 Universal, mentre i file delle pubblicazioni sono rilasciati con licenza Attribuzione 4.0 Internazionale (CC BY 4.0), salvo diversa indicazione.
In caso di violazione di copyright, contattare Supporto Iris