Interaction between national courts and the European Court of Human Rights is a crucial issue for the future of the European Convention system, as reflected in the Brighton Conference’s agenda and its follow-up.The article focuses on the approaches the UK and the Italian judges have developed in their interaction with the Strasbourg Court jurisprudence. By exploring the differences and similarities between them, the article highlights a tension between the commitment to fulfilling international obligations and a drive to preserving constitutional balance and identity.
Sonelli, Silvia Angela. "The Dialogue between National Courts and the European Court of Human Rights: Comparative Perspectives" Working paper, SSRN (Social Science Research Network), 2014.
The Dialogue between National Courts and the European Court of Human Rights: Comparative Perspectives
SONELLI, Silvia Angela
2014
Abstract
Interaction between national courts and the European Court of Human Rights is a crucial issue for the future of the European Convention system, as reflected in the Brighton Conference’s agenda and its follow-up.The article focuses on the approaches the UK and the Italian judges have developed in their interaction with the Strasbourg Court jurisprudence. By exploring the differences and similarities between them, the article highlights a tension between the commitment to fulfilling international obligations and a drive to preserving constitutional balance and identity.File | Dimensione | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|
SSRN-id2421034 (1).pdf
Accesso riservato
Tipologia:
VOR - Versione pubblicata dall'editore
Dimensione
390.04 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
390.04 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri Richiedi una copia |
Pubblicazioni consigliate
I metadati presenti in IRIS UNIMORE sono rilasciati con licenza Creative Commons CC0 1.0 Universal, mentre i file delle pubblicazioni sono rilasciati con licenza Attribuzione 4.0 Internazionale (CC BY 4.0), salvo diversa indicazione.
In caso di violazione di copyright, contattare Supporto Iris