Background: several clinical risk scores are available for the risk stratification of patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI), such as the CADILLAC, GRACE, PAMI, TIMI, and Zwolle, but all are complex to use and there is uncertainty on the best one. The age-creatinine-ejection fraction (ACEF) score, has been recently proven effective and proficient as a risk score in cardiac surgery despite its user-friendliness. We thus aimed to compare the performance of the ACEF score in comparison to the other available risk scores in patient with STEMI. Methods: subjects with STEMI undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention at our Institution from 2001 to 2009 were enrolled. The primary end-point was in-hospital all-cause death, whereas long-term all-cause death, long-term cardiac death were appraised as secondary outcomes. ACEF, CADILLAC, GRACE, PAMI, TIMI, and Zwolle risk scores were compared with receiver-operating characteristics (ROC) curves with areas under the curve (AUC), and binary multivariable logistic regression analysis with odds ratios (OR), plus 95% confidence intervals.
The ACEF score: a simple but powerful predictor of short-term mortality in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction / Sangiorgi, Gm; Bertelli, L; Zoccai, Gb; Sgura, F; Monopoli, D; Politi, L; Rossi, R; Modena, Mg. - In: EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL. - ISSN 0195-668X. - 31:(2010), pp. 193-193. (Intervento presentato al convegno Congress of the European-Society-of-Cardiology (ESC) tenutosi a STOCKHOLM nel 28/08 - 01/09 2010).
The ACEF score: a simple but powerful predictor of short-term mortality in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction
Bertelli, L;Monopoli, D;Politi, L;Rossi, R;Modena, MG
2010
Abstract
Background: several clinical risk scores are available for the risk stratification of patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI), such as the CADILLAC, GRACE, PAMI, TIMI, and Zwolle, but all are complex to use and there is uncertainty on the best one. The age-creatinine-ejection fraction (ACEF) score, has been recently proven effective and proficient as a risk score in cardiac surgery despite its user-friendliness. We thus aimed to compare the performance of the ACEF score in comparison to the other available risk scores in patient with STEMI. Methods: subjects with STEMI undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention at our Institution from 2001 to 2009 were enrolled. The primary end-point was in-hospital all-cause death, whereas long-term all-cause death, long-term cardiac death were appraised as secondary outcomes. ACEF, CADILLAC, GRACE, PAMI, TIMI, and Zwolle risk scores were compared with receiver-operating characteristics (ROC) curves with areas under the curve (AUC), and binary multivariable logistic regression analysis with odds ratios (OR), plus 95% confidence intervals.File | Dimensione | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|
Abstract_ (3).pdf
Accesso riservato
Tipologia:
Versione pubblicata dall'editore
Dimensione
155.34 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
155.34 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri Richiedi una copia |
Pubblicazioni consigliate
I metadati presenti in IRIS UNIMORE sono rilasciati con licenza Creative Commons CC0 1.0 Universal, mentre i file delle pubblicazioni sono rilasciati con licenza Attribuzione 4.0 Internazionale (CC BY 4.0), salvo diversa indicazione.
In caso di violazione di copyright, contattare Supporto Iris