Starting from the 1950’s, different European countrieshave established official lists of grapevine varieties authorizedto be cultivated. The objectives of such lists were tolimit ambiguous denomination of varieties and the relatedtrade conflicts, as well as the implementation of viticulturerecovery politics through the support of certain varietiesand the limitation of others. In the same direction, in 1968the European Union (EU) decided to create a “commoncatalogue of varieties”, defined as the sum of current nationalcatalogues (Council Directive of 9 April 1968 “onthe marketing of material for the vegetative propagation ofthe vine”, 68/193/EEC, modified). These catalogues (alsocalled “registers”) include all the wine varieties “classified”by each Member State within the framework of theCommon Organisation of the Market in wine (CouncilDirective No 479/2008), as well as all the non-classifiedvarieties (table grape, rootstocks, etc.).For this work, we took the opportunity of the Europeanresearch program “GrapeGen06”, focused on thestudy and the preservation of grapevine genetic resources,to contribute to the establishment and improvement of suchan European catalogue. The comprehensive survey aimsat two objectives: to support the implementation of Europeanregulations on propagation of grapevine plants withinthe EU, and to assess priority actions, by technical and researchinstitutes, for the conservation of grapevine geneticresources.

Grapevine European Catalogue: Towards a Comprehensive List / T., Lacombe; L., Audeguin; M., Boselli; B., Bucchetti; F., Cabello; P., Chatelet; M., Crespan; C., D’Onofrio; J., EIRAS DIAS; S., Ercisli; M., Gardiman; M. S., Grando; Imazio, Serena Anna; O., Jandurova; A., Jung; E., Kiss; P., Kozma; E., Maul; D., Maghradze; M. C., Martinez; G., Muñoz; J. K., Pátková; I., Pejic; E., Peterlunger; D., Pitsoli; D., Preiner; S., Raimondi; F., Regner; G., Savin; S., Savvides; A., Schneider; J. L., Spring; A., Szoke; A., Veres; J. M., Boursiquot; R., Bacilieri; P., This. - In: VITIS. - ISSN 0042-7500. - ELETTRONICO. - 50:(2011), pp. 65-68.

Grapevine European Catalogue: Towards a Comprehensive List

IMAZIO, Serena Anna;
2011

Abstract

Starting from the 1950’s, different European countrieshave established official lists of grapevine varieties authorizedto be cultivated. The objectives of such lists were tolimit ambiguous denomination of varieties and the relatedtrade conflicts, as well as the implementation of viticulturerecovery politics through the support of certain varietiesand the limitation of others. In the same direction, in 1968the European Union (EU) decided to create a “commoncatalogue of varieties”, defined as the sum of current nationalcatalogues (Council Directive of 9 April 1968 “onthe marketing of material for the vegetative propagation ofthe vine”, 68/193/EEC, modified). These catalogues (alsocalled “registers”) include all the wine varieties “classified”by each Member State within the framework of theCommon Organisation of the Market in wine (CouncilDirective No 479/2008), as well as all the non-classifiedvarieties (table grape, rootstocks, etc.).For this work, we took the opportunity of the Europeanresearch program “GrapeGen06”, focused on thestudy and the preservation of grapevine genetic resources,to contribute to the establishment and improvement of suchan European catalogue. The comprehensive survey aimsat two objectives: to support the implementation of Europeanregulations on propagation of grapevine plants withinthe EU, and to assess priority actions, by technical and researchinstitutes, for the conservation of grapevine geneticresources.
2011
50
65
68
Grapevine European Catalogue: Towards a Comprehensive List / T., Lacombe; L., Audeguin; M., Boselli; B., Bucchetti; F., Cabello; P., Chatelet; M., Crespan; C., D’Onofrio; J., EIRAS DIAS; S., Ercisli; M., Gardiman; M. S., Grando; Imazio, Serena Anna; O., Jandurova; A., Jung; E., Kiss; P., Kozma; E., Maul; D., Maghradze; M. C., Martinez; G., Muñoz; J. K., Pátková; I., Pejic; E., Peterlunger; D., Pitsoli; D., Preiner; S., Raimondi; F., Regner; G., Savin; S., Savvides; A., Schneider; J. L., Spring; A., Szoke; A., Veres; J. M., Boursiquot; R., Bacilieri; P., This. - In: VITIS. - ISSN 0042-7500. - ELETTRONICO. - 50:(2011), pp. 65-68.
T., Lacombe; L., Audeguin; M., Boselli; B., Bucchetti; F., Cabello; P., Chatelet; M., Crespan; C., D’Onofrio; J., EIRAS DIAS; S., Ercisli; M., Gardiman; M. S., Grando; Imazio, Serena Anna; O., Jandurova; A., Jung; E., Kiss; P., Kozma; E., Maul; D., Maghradze; M. C., Martinez; G., Muñoz; J. K., Pátková; I., Pejic; E., Peterlunger; D., Pitsoli; D., Preiner; S., Raimondi; F., Regner; G., Savin; S., Savvides; A., Schneider; J. L., Spring; A., Szoke; A., Veres; J. M., Boursiquot; R., Bacilieri; P., This
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
lacombe_2011_vitis.pdf

Accesso riservato

Tipologia: Versione dell'autore revisionata e accettata per la pubblicazione
Dimensione 149.69 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
149.69 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia
Pubblicazioni consigliate

Licenza Creative Commons
I metadati presenti in IRIS UNIMORE sono rilasciati con licenza Creative Commons CC0 1.0 Universal, mentre i file delle pubblicazioni sono rilasciati con licenza Attribuzione 4.0 Internazionale (CC BY 4.0), salvo diversa indicazione.
In caso di violazione di copyright, contattare Supporto Iris

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11380/744499
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 44
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 40
social impact