In this paper we contribute to the debate on the relationship between growth and well-being by examining an endogenous growth model where we allow for externalities in consumption, leisure, and production. We analyze three regimes: a decentralized economy where each household makes isolated choices without considering their external effects, a planned economy where a myopic planner fails to recognize both leisure and consumption externalities but recognizes production externalities, and a planned economy with a fully informed planner. We first compare the balanced growth paths under the three regimes and then we numerically investigate the transition to the optimal balanced growth path. We provide a number of findings. First, in a decentralized economy growth or labor (or both) are greater than in the regime with a fully informed planner, and hence are sub-optimal from a welfare standpoint. Second, a myopic intervention which overlooks consumption and leisure externalities leads to more growth and labor than in both the decentralized and the fully informed regime. Third, we provide a case for happy degrowth: a transition to the optimal balanced growth path that is associated with downscaling of production, a reduction in private consumption, and an ongoing increase in leisure and well-being.

Long-run welfare under externalities in consumption, leisure, and production: A case for happy degrowth vs. unhappy growth / Bilancini, Ennio; D'Alessandro, S.. - In: ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS. - ISSN 0921-8009. - STAMPA. - 84:(2012), pp. 194-205. [10.1016/j.ecolecon.2011.10.023]

Long-run welfare under externalities in consumption, leisure, and production: A case for happy degrowth vs. unhappy growth

2012

Abstract

In this paper we contribute to the debate on the relationship between growth and well-being by examining an endogenous growth model where we allow for externalities in consumption, leisure, and production. We analyze three regimes: a decentralized economy where each household makes isolated choices without considering their external effects, a planned economy where a myopic planner fails to recognize both leisure and consumption externalities but recognizes production externalities, and a planned economy with a fully informed planner. We first compare the balanced growth paths under the three regimes and then we numerically investigate the transition to the optimal balanced growth path. We provide a number of findings. First, in a decentralized economy growth or labor (or both) are greater than in the regime with a fully informed planner, and hence are sub-optimal from a welfare standpoint. Second, a myopic intervention which overlooks consumption and leisure externalities leads to more growth and labor than in both the decentralized and the fully informed regime. Third, we provide a case for happy degrowth: a transition to the optimal balanced growth path that is associated with downscaling of production, a reduction in private consumption, and an ongoing increase in leisure and well-being.
2012
84
194
205
Long-run welfare under externalities in consumption, leisure, and production: A case for happy degrowth vs. unhappy growth / Bilancini, Ennio; D'Alessandro, S.. - In: ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS. - ISSN 0921-8009. - STAMPA. - 84:(2012), pp. 194-205. [10.1016/j.ecolecon.2011.10.023]
Bilancini, Ennio; D'Alessandro, S.
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
bida-ecoeco.pdf

Accesso riservato

Tipologia: Versione originale dell'autore proposta per la pubblicazione
Dimensione 622.87 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
622.87 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia
Pubblicazioni consigliate

Licenza Creative Commons
I metadati presenti in IRIS UNIMORE sono rilasciati con licenza Creative Commons CC0 1.0 Universal, mentre i file delle pubblicazioni sono rilasciati con licenza Attribuzione 4.0 Internazionale (CC BY 4.0), salvo diversa indicazione.
In caso di violazione di copyright, contattare Supporto Iris

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11380/742425
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 41
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 34
social impact