Layer charge value and location are commonly considered key factors for predicting interaction of layer silicates with external agents, such as, for example, pollutants, bio-molecules, and, more generally, ionic complexes. Several methods are discussed in literature for the experimental determination of layer charge, always, however, giving an average value from the different micro-crystals used for the analysis. The most commonly used methods are: the structural formula method [1, 2], the alkylammonium method [3] and the potassium saturation method [4]. The purpose of this paper is to demonstrate that the determination of the average value of the layer charge can sometimes lead to inconsistent results, as not correctly representing the layer charge location at mineral surface. This goal was achieved by analyzing crystal chemical results obtained from different crystals of muscovite characterized by a different content of celadonitic substitution. Muscovite sometimes presents heterovalent substitutions both in tetrahedral (e.g., Al3+ for Si4+) and in octahedral sites (e.g., Mg2+, Fe2+, and vacancies for Al in octahedral sites). Our results seem to demonstrate that these substitutions can be ascribed to trioctahedral cells, all occupied by cations different than Al, in a dominating dioctahedral pattern, with cis-octahedral sites entirely occupied by Al and the trans-site vacant. This interpretation suggests that mean layer charge may not represent effective layer charge at mineral surface because it refers not to randomly distributed substitution, but to domains showing different chemistry which can be locally charge-neutralized. Furthermore, also distortion parameters which affect tetrahedral topology and that can also affect the formation of surface complexes, such as alpha angle and delta z oxygen plane flattening, can be different inside a same structure and locally not corresponding strictly to the determined mean value via single crystal diffraction.

Layer charge location in layer silicates and its implications / Elmi, Chiara; Brigatti, Maria Franca; Malferrari, Daniele. - In: EPITOME. - ISSN 1972-1552. - STAMPA. - 4:(2011), pp. 220-220. (Intervento presentato al convegno Geoitalia 2011 tenutosi a Torino nel 19-23 settembre 2011).

Layer charge location in layer silicates and its implications

ELMI, Chiara;BRIGATTI, Maria Franca;MALFERRARI, Daniele
2011

Abstract

Layer charge value and location are commonly considered key factors for predicting interaction of layer silicates with external agents, such as, for example, pollutants, bio-molecules, and, more generally, ionic complexes. Several methods are discussed in literature for the experimental determination of layer charge, always, however, giving an average value from the different micro-crystals used for the analysis. The most commonly used methods are: the structural formula method [1, 2], the alkylammonium method [3] and the potassium saturation method [4]. The purpose of this paper is to demonstrate that the determination of the average value of the layer charge can sometimes lead to inconsistent results, as not correctly representing the layer charge location at mineral surface. This goal was achieved by analyzing crystal chemical results obtained from different crystals of muscovite characterized by a different content of celadonitic substitution. Muscovite sometimes presents heterovalent substitutions both in tetrahedral (e.g., Al3+ for Si4+) and in octahedral sites (e.g., Mg2+, Fe2+, and vacancies for Al in octahedral sites). Our results seem to demonstrate that these substitutions can be ascribed to trioctahedral cells, all occupied by cations different than Al, in a dominating dioctahedral pattern, with cis-octahedral sites entirely occupied by Al and the trans-site vacant. This interpretation suggests that mean layer charge may not represent effective layer charge at mineral surface because it refers not to randomly distributed substitution, but to domains showing different chemistry which can be locally charge-neutralized. Furthermore, also distortion parameters which affect tetrahedral topology and that can also affect the formation of surface complexes, such as alpha angle and delta z oxygen plane flattening, can be different inside a same structure and locally not corresponding strictly to the determined mean value via single crystal diffraction.
2011
4
220
220
Elmi, Chiara; Brigatti, Maria Franca; Malferrari, Daniele
Layer charge location in layer silicates and its implications / Elmi, Chiara; Brigatti, Maria Franca; Malferrari, Daniele. - In: EPITOME. - ISSN 1972-1552. - STAMPA. - 4:(2011), pp. 220-220. (Intervento presentato al convegno Geoitalia 2011 tenutosi a Torino nel 19-23 settembre 2011).
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.
Pubblicazioni consigliate

Licenza Creative Commons
I metadati presenti in IRIS UNIMORE sono rilasciati con licenza Creative Commons CC0 1.0 Universal, mentre i file delle pubblicazioni sono rilasciati con licenza Attribuzione 4.0 Internazionale (CC BY 4.0), salvo diversa indicazione.
In caso di violazione di copyright, contattare Supporto Iris

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11380/739073
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact