While some argue that organizations should concentrate on only one direction in order to avoid risking mediocrity in their exploration and exploitation activities, recent literature has indicated that ambidexterity can positively affect organizational performance. The scant respondent-dependent and cross-sectional studies advanced in support of the relationship between organizational ambidexterity and performance render inconclusive the actual value of ambidexterity. Further uncertainty stems from the lack of knowledge of the antecedents of ambidexterity. In this paper, we address both the theoretical and the empirical uncertainties surrounding ambidexterity. We provide a theoretical framework that links volatility in organizational engagement in exploration and exploitation, ambidexterity and firm performance. We argue that such volatility hampers the learning required for the attainment of ambidexterity, rendering the organization unable to reap the benefits of simultaneously executing exploration and exploitation. We further argue that ambidexterity in turn mediates the relationship between volatility and firm performance. A longitudinal analysis of 467 bank-year observations collected from the Norwegian banking industry over the period 1995 to 2003 provides strong empirical support for our theoretical model.

Banking on Ambidexterity: A Longitudinal Study of Ambidexterity, Volatility and Performance / A., Sasson; Minoja, Mario. - STAMPA. - (2010), pp. 240-263.

Banking on Ambidexterity: A Longitudinal Study of Ambidexterity, Volatility and Performance

MINOJA, Mario
2010

Abstract

While some argue that organizations should concentrate on only one direction in order to avoid risking mediocrity in their exploration and exploitation activities, recent literature has indicated that ambidexterity can positively affect organizational performance. The scant respondent-dependent and cross-sectional studies advanced in support of the relationship between organizational ambidexterity and performance render inconclusive the actual value of ambidexterity. Further uncertainty stems from the lack of knowledge of the antecedents of ambidexterity. In this paper, we address both the theoretical and the empirical uncertainties surrounding ambidexterity. We provide a theoretical framework that links volatility in organizational engagement in exploration and exploitation, ambidexterity and firm performance. We argue that such volatility hampers the learning required for the attainment of ambidexterity, rendering the organization unable to reap the benefits of simultaneously executing exploration and exploitation. We further argue that ambidexterity in turn mediates the relationship between volatility and firm performance. A longitudinal analysis of 467 bank-year observations collected from the Norwegian banking industry over the period 1995 to 2003 provides strong empirical support for our theoretical model.
2010
Handbook of Research on Strategy Process
9781848440449
Edward Elgar Publishing
STATI UNITI D'AMERICA
Banking on Ambidexterity: A Longitudinal Study of Ambidexterity, Volatility and Performance / A., Sasson; Minoja, Mario. - STAMPA. - (2010), pp. 240-263.
A., Sasson; Minoja, Mario
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Sasson_Minoja_Chapter11.pdf

Accesso riservato

Tipologia: Versione dell'autore revisionata e accettata per la pubblicazione
Dimensione 213.19 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
213.19 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia
Pubblicazioni consigliate

Licenza Creative Commons
I metadati presenti in IRIS UNIMORE sono rilasciati con licenza Creative Commons CC0 1.0 Universal, mentre i file delle pubblicazioni sono rilasciati con licenza Attribuzione 4.0 Internazionale (CC BY 4.0), salvo diversa indicazione.
In caso di violazione di copyright, contattare Supporto Iris

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11380/618898
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 1
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 1
social impact