Objective: To determine the predictive dermoscopic features of amelanotic and hypomelanotic melanoma. Design: A total of 105 melanomas (median Breslow thickness, 0.76 mm), 170 benign melanocytic lesions, and 222 nonmelanocytic lesions lacking significant pigment (amelanotic, partially pigmented, and light colored) were imaged using glass-plate dermoscopy devices and scored for 99 dermoscopic features. Diagnostic models were derived from and tested on independent randomly selected lesions. Setting: Predominantly hospital-based clinics from 5 continents. Main Outcome Measures: Sensitivity, specificity, and odds ratios for individual features and models for the diagnosis of melanoma and malignancy. Results: The most significant negative predictors of melanoma were having multiple (> 3) milialike cysts (odds ratio, 0.09; 95% confidence interval, 0.01-0.64), comma vessels with a regular distribution (0.10; 0.01-0.70), comma vessels as the predominant vessel type (0.16; 0.05-0.52), symmetrical pigmentation pattern (0.18; 0.09-0.39), irregular blue-gray globules (0.20; 0.05-0.87), and multiple blue-gray globules (0.28; 0.10-0.81). The most significant positive predictors were having a blue-white veil (odds ratio, 13; 95% confidence interval, 3.9-40.0), scarlike depigmentation (4.4; 2.4-8.0), multiple blue-gray dots (3.5; 1.9-6.4), irregularly shaped depigmentation (3.3; 2.0-5.3), irregular brown dots/globules (3.2; 1.8-5.6), 5 to 6 colors (3.2; 1.6-6.3), and predominant central vessels (3.1; 1.6-6.0). A simple model distinguishing melanomas from all nonmelanomas had a sensitivity of 70% and a specificity of 56% in the test set. A model distinguishing all malignant lesions from benign lesions had a sensitivity of 96% and a specificity of 37%. Conclusion: Although the diagnostic accuracy of dermoscopy for melanoma lacking significant pigment is inferior to that of more pigmented lesions, features distinguishing the former from benign lesions can be visualized on dermoscopic evaluation.

Dermoscopic evaluation of amelanotic and hypomelanotic melanoma / S. W., Menzies; J., Kreusch; K., Byth; M. A., Pizzichetta; A., Marghoob; R., Braun; J., Malvehy; S., Puig; G., Argenziano; I., Zalaudek; H. S., Rabinovitz; M., Oliviero; H., Cabo; V., Ahlgrimm Siess; M., Avramidis; P., Guitera; H. P., Soyer; G., Ghigliotti; M., Tanaka; A. M., Perusquia; G., Pagnanelli; R., Bono; L., Thomas; Pellacani, Giovanni; D., Langford; D., Piccolo; K., Terstappen; I., Stanganelli; A., Llambrich; R., Johr. - In: ARCHIVES OF DERMATOLOGY. - ISSN 0003-987X. - STAMPA. - 144:9(2008), pp. 1120-1127. [10.1001/archderm.144.9.1120]

Dermoscopic evaluation of amelanotic and hypomelanotic melanoma

PELLACANI, Giovanni;
2008

Abstract

Objective: To determine the predictive dermoscopic features of amelanotic and hypomelanotic melanoma. Design: A total of 105 melanomas (median Breslow thickness, 0.76 mm), 170 benign melanocytic lesions, and 222 nonmelanocytic lesions lacking significant pigment (amelanotic, partially pigmented, and light colored) were imaged using glass-plate dermoscopy devices and scored for 99 dermoscopic features. Diagnostic models were derived from and tested on independent randomly selected lesions. Setting: Predominantly hospital-based clinics from 5 continents. Main Outcome Measures: Sensitivity, specificity, and odds ratios for individual features and models for the diagnosis of melanoma and malignancy. Results: The most significant negative predictors of melanoma were having multiple (> 3) milialike cysts (odds ratio, 0.09; 95% confidence interval, 0.01-0.64), comma vessels with a regular distribution (0.10; 0.01-0.70), comma vessels as the predominant vessel type (0.16; 0.05-0.52), symmetrical pigmentation pattern (0.18; 0.09-0.39), irregular blue-gray globules (0.20; 0.05-0.87), and multiple blue-gray globules (0.28; 0.10-0.81). The most significant positive predictors were having a blue-white veil (odds ratio, 13; 95% confidence interval, 3.9-40.0), scarlike depigmentation (4.4; 2.4-8.0), multiple blue-gray dots (3.5; 1.9-6.4), irregularly shaped depigmentation (3.3; 2.0-5.3), irregular brown dots/globules (3.2; 1.8-5.6), 5 to 6 colors (3.2; 1.6-6.3), and predominant central vessels (3.1; 1.6-6.0). A simple model distinguishing melanomas from all nonmelanomas had a sensitivity of 70% and a specificity of 56% in the test set. A model distinguishing all malignant lesions from benign lesions had a sensitivity of 96% and a specificity of 37%. Conclusion: Although the diagnostic accuracy of dermoscopy for melanoma lacking significant pigment is inferior to that of more pigmented lesions, features distinguishing the former from benign lesions can be visualized on dermoscopic evaluation.
2008
144
9
1120
1127
Dermoscopic evaluation of amelanotic and hypomelanotic melanoma / S. W., Menzies; J., Kreusch; K., Byth; M. A., Pizzichetta; A., Marghoob; R., Braun; J., Malvehy; S., Puig; G., Argenziano; I., Zalaudek; H. S., Rabinovitz; M., Oliviero; H., Cabo; V., Ahlgrimm Siess; M., Avramidis; P., Guitera; H. P., Soyer; G., Ghigliotti; M., Tanaka; A. M., Perusquia; G., Pagnanelli; R., Bono; L., Thomas; Pellacani, Giovanni; D., Langford; D., Piccolo; K., Terstappen; I., Stanganelli; A., Llambrich; R., Johr. - In: ARCHIVES OF DERMATOLOGY. - ISSN 0003-987X. - STAMPA. - 144:9(2008), pp. 1120-1127. [10.1001/archderm.144.9.1120]
S. W., Menzies; J., Kreusch; K., Byth; M. A., Pizzichetta; A., Marghoob; R., Braun; J., Malvehy; S., Puig; G., Argenziano; I., Zalaudek; H. S., Rabinovitz; M., Oliviero; H., Cabo; V., Ahlgrimm Siess; M., Avramidis; P., Guitera; H. P., Soyer; G., Ghigliotti; M., Tanaka; A. M., Perusquia; G., Pagnanelli; R., Bono; L., Thomas; Pellacani, Giovanni; D., Langford; D., Piccolo; K., Terstappen; I., Stanganelli; A., Llambrich; R., Johr
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
VOR_Dermoscopic evaluation of amelanotic and hypomelanotic melanoma.pdf

Accesso riservato

Tipologia: Versione pubblicata dall'editore
Dimensione 204.62 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
204.62 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia
Pubblicazioni consigliate

Licenza Creative Commons
I metadati presenti in IRIS UNIMORE sono rilasciati con licenza Creative Commons CC0 1.0 Universal, mentre i file delle pubblicazioni sono rilasciati con licenza Attribuzione 4.0 Internazionale (CC BY 4.0), salvo diversa indicazione.
In caso di violazione di copyright, contattare Supporto Iris

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11380/611956
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 54
  • Scopus 246
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 213
social impact