We explored the influence of morphology on geographic differences in 5-year survival for non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) diagnosed in 1990-1994 and followed for 5years: 16,955 cases from 27 EUROCARE-3 cancer registries, and 22,713 cases from 9 US SEER registries. Overall 5-year relative survival was 56.1% in EUROCARE west, 47.1% in EUROCARE east and 56.3% in SEER. Relative excess risk (RER) of death was 1.05 (95% confidence interval (CI) 1.01-1.10) in EUROCARE west, 1.52 (95% CI 1.44-1.60) in EUROCARE east (SEER reference). Excess risk of death was significantly above reference (diffuse B lymphoma) for Burkitt's and NOS lymphoma; not different for lymphoblastic and other T-cell; significantly below reference (in the order of decreasing relative excess risk) for NHL NOS, mantle cell/centrocytic, lymphoplasmacytic, follicular, small lymphocytic/chronic lymphocytic leukaemia, other specified NHL and cutaneous morphologies. Interpretation of marked variation in survival with morphology is complicated by classification inconsistencies. The completeness and standardisation of cancer registry morphology data needs to be improved.

Influence of morphology on survival for non-Hodgkin lymphoma in Europe and the United States / Sant, M; Allemani, C; DE ANGELIS, R; Carbone, A; DE SANJOSÈ, S; Gianni, Am; Giraldo, P; Marchesi, F; MARCOS GRAGERA, R; MARTOS JIMÉNEZ, C; Maynadié, M; Raphael, M; Berrino, F; Benatti, Piero. - In: EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER. - ISSN 0959-8049. - STAMPA. - 44:4(2008), pp. 579-587. [10.1016/j.ejca.2007.12.016]

Influence of morphology on survival for non-Hodgkin lymphoma in Europe and the United States

BENATTI, Piero
2008

Abstract

We explored the influence of morphology on geographic differences in 5-year survival for non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) diagnosed in 1990-1994 and followed for 5years: 16,955 cases from 27 EUROCARE-3 cancer registries, and 22,713 cases from 9 US SEER registries. Overall 5-year relative survival was 56.1% in EUROCARE west, 47.1% in EUROCARE east and 56.3% in SEER. Relative excess risk (RER) of death was 1.05 (95% confidence interval (CI) 1.01-1.10) in EUROCARE west, 1.52 (95% CI 1.44-1.60) in EUROCARE east (SEER reference). Excess risk of death was significantly above reference (diffuse B lymphoma) for Burkitt's and NOS lymphoma; not different for lymphoblastic and other T-cell; significantly below reference (in the order of decreasing relative excess risk) for NHL NOS, mantle cell/centrocytic, lymphoplasmacytic, follicular, small lymphocytic/chronic lymphocytic leukaemia, other specified NHL and cutaneous morphologies. Interpretation of marked variation in survival with morphology is complicated by classification inconsistencies. The completeness and standardisation of cancer registry morphology data needs to be improved.
2008
44
4
579
587
Influence of morphology on survival for non-Hodgkin lymphoma in Europe and the United States / Sant, M; Allemani, C; DE ANGELIS, R; Carbone, A; DE SANJOSÈ, S; Gianni, Am; Giraldo, P; Marchesi, F; MARCOS GRAGERA, R; MARTOS JIMÉNEZ, C; Maynadié, M; Raphael, M; Berrino, F; Benatti, Piero. - In: EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER. - ISSN 0959-8049. - STAMPA. - 44:4(2008), pp. 579-587. [10.1016/j.ejca.2007.12.016]
Sant, M; Allemani, C; DE ANGELIS, R; Carbone, A; DE SANJOSÈ, S; Gianni, Am; Giraldo, P; Marchesi, F; MARCOS GRAGERA, R; MARTOS JIMÉNEZ, C; Maynadié, M; Raphael, M; Berrino, F; Benatti, Piero
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
2008 eur j cancer sant m.pdf

Solo gestori archivio

Tipologia: Versione pubblicata dall'editore
Dimensione 180.05 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
180.05 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia
Pubblicazioni consigliate

Licenza Creative Commons
I metadati presenti in IRIS UNIMORE sono rilasciati con licenza Creative Commons CC0 1.0 Universal, mentre i file delle pubblicazioni sono rilasciati con licenza Attribuzione 4.0 Internazionale (CC BY 4.0), salvo diversa indicazione.
In caso di violazione di copyright, contattare Supporto Iris

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11380/608171
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 8
  • Scopus 30
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 31
social impact