The objective of this paper is to bring new insights into the linguistic study of judicial argumentation. Analysis explores the use of the most frequent connectors and metaargumentative expressions in a corpus including judgements from three different courts. Results show that these elements act as kernels in the construction of argumentative discourse on the part of judges
“The Rhetoric of Judicial Texts: the Interplay of Reported Argumentation and the Judge’s Argumentative Voice” / Mazzi, Davide. - STAMPA. - (2007), pp. 379-399.
“The Rhetoric of Judicial Texts: the Interplay of Reported Argumentation and the Judge’s Argumentative Voice”
MAZZI, Davide
2007
Abstract
The objective of this paper is to bring new insights into the linguistic study of judicial argumentation. Analysis explores the use of the most frequent connectors and metaargumentative expressions in a corpus including judgements from three different courts. Results show that these elements act as kernels in the construction of argumentative discourse on the part of judgesPubblicazioni consigliate
I metadati presenti in IRIS UNIMORE sono rilasciati con licenza Creative Commons CC0 1.0 Universal, mentre i file delle pubblicazioni sono rilasciati con licenza Attribuzione 4.0 Internazionale (CC BY 4.0), salvo diversa indicazione.
In caso di violazione di copyright, contattare Supporto Iris