The aim of the present study was to investigate whether thebiological relevance of the stimulus could enhance taskirrelevantspatial information delivered by a pair of bilateralstimuli. Participants had to perform a Simon-like task in whichthey were required to respond to the color of two framedsquares (on and off-centered), two framed arrows, or twoschematic eyes by pressing one of two keys on the left and onthe right of the body midline. Results showed that regardless ofstimulus type responses towards the direction indicated by thestimuli (corresponding stimulus-response pairings) were fasterthan responses against it (non-corresponding stimulus-responsepairings). It is argued that the biological relevance of the stimulidoes not seem to play a crucial role in the automatic processingof stimulus inherent spatial properties.

Is there any difference between the spatial response code elicited by bilateral symmetrical biological and non-biological stimuli? / Ricciardelli, P.; Bonfiglioli, C.; Iani, Cristina; C., Rubichi; S., Nicoletti. - STAMPA. - (2005), pp. 1845-1849. (Intervento presentato al convegno XXVII Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society CogSci 2005 tenutosi a Stresa nel 21-23 luglio 2005).

Is there any difference between the spatial response code elicited by bilateral symmetrical biological and non-biological stimuli?

IANI, Cristina;
2005

Abstract

The aim of the present study was to investigate whether thebiological relevance of the stimulus could enhance taskirrelevantspatial information delivered by a pair of bilateralstimuli. Participants had to perform a Simon-like task in whichthey were required to respond to the color of two framedsquares (on and off-centered), two framed arrows, or twoschematic eyes by pressing one of two keys on the left and onthe right of the body midline. Results showed that regardless ofstimulus type responses towards the direction indicated by thestimuli (corresponding stimulus-response pairings) were fasterthan responses against it (non-corresponding stimulus-responsepairings). It is argued that the biological relevance of the stimulidoes not seem to play a crucial role in the automatic processingof stimulus inherent spatial properties.
2005
XXVII Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society CogSci 2005
Stresa
21-23 luglio 2005
1845
1849
Ricciardelli, P.; Bonfiglioli, C.; Iani, Cristina; C., Rubichi; S., Nicoletti
Is there any difference between the spatial response code elicited by bilateral symmetrical biological and non-biological stimuli? / Ricciardelli, P.; Bonfiglioli, C.; Iani, Cristina; C., Rubichi; S., Nicoletti. - STAMPA. - (2005), pp. 1845-1849. (Intervento presentato al convegno XXVII Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society CogSci 2005 tenutosi a Stresa nel 21-23 luglio 2005).
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.
Pubblicazioni consigliate

Licenza Creative Commons
I metadati presenti in IRIS UNIMORE sono rilasciati con licenza Creative Commons CC0 1.0 Universal, mentre i file delle pubblicazioni sono rilasciati con licenza Attribuzione 4.0 Internazionale (CC BY 4.0), salvo diversa indicazione.
In caso di violazione di copyright, contattare Supporto Iris

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11380/466182
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact