The study investigated whether the Simon effect, and its facilitation and interference components, shows up in reaction time (RT) or in movement time (MT), depending on the response strategy. Experiment 1 replicated a study by Hietanen and Rama. Subjects had to press one of two lateralised keys in response to one of two stimuli. The stimuli were presented in the center (neutral condition) or to the left or right side (corresponding or non-corresponding conditions). To press the response key, a reaching movement was necessary, and both RT and MT were recorded. One group of subjects showed an RT facilitation effect and an MT interference effect. Another group of subjects showed both MT facilitation and MT interference effects. It was hypothesized that the two groups used different response strategies. In Exps. 2 and 3, the subjects were explicitly instructed to use the two strategies that were hypothesized for Exp. 1. The results showed that whether facilitation and interference manifest themselves in RT or MT depends on the response strategy adopted by the subjects.

Response strategies and the Simon effect / Rubichi, Sandro; R., Nicoletti; C., Umilta; M., Zorzi. - In: PSYCHOLOGICAL RESEARCH. - ISSN 0340-0727. - STAMPA. - 63:(2000), pp. 129-136. [10.1007/PL00008171]

Response strategies and the Simon effect

RUBICHI, Sandro;
2000

Abstract

The study investigated whether the Simon effect, and its facilitation and interference components, shows up in reaction time (RT) or in movement time (MT), depending on the response strategy. Experiment 1 replicated a study by Hietanen and Rama. Subjects had to press one of two lateralised keys in response to one of two stimuli. The stimuli were presented in the center (neutral condition) or to the left or right side (corresponding or non-corresponding conditions). To press the response key, a reaching movement was necessary, and both RT and MT were recorded. One group of subjects showed an RT facilitation effect and an MT interference effect. Another group of subjects showed both MT facilitation and MT interference effects. It was hypothesized that the two groups used different response strategies. In Exps. 2 and 3, the subjects were explicitly instructed to use the two strategies that were hypothesized for Exp. 1. The results showed that whether facilitation and interference manifest themselves in RT or MT depends on the response strategy adopted by the subjects.
2000
63
129
136
Response strategies and the Simon effect / Rubichi, Sandro; R., Nicoletti; C., Umilta; M., Zorzi. - In: PSYCHOLOGICAL RESEARCH. - ISSN 0340-0727. - STAMPA. - 63:(2000), pp. 129-136. [10.1007/PL00008171]
Rubichi, Sandro; R., Nicoletti; C., Umilta; M., Zorzi
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.
Pubblicazioni consigliate

Licenza Creative Commons
I metadati presenti in IRIS UNIMORE sono rilasciati con licenza Creative Commons CC0 1.0 Universal, mentre i file delle pubblicazioni sono rilasciati con licenza Attribuzione 4.0 Internazionale (CC BY 4.0), salvo diversa indicazione.
In caso di violazione di copyright, contattare Supporto Iris

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11380/307121
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 5
  • Scopus 40
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 35
social impact