Previous research involving epithelial ovarian cancer patients showed that, compared to germline BRCA (gBRCA) mutations, somatic BRCA (sBRCA) mutations present a similar positive impact with regard to overall survival (OS) and platinum and PARP (poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase) inhibitor sensitivity. Nevertheless, molecular testing in these studies did not include copy number variation (CNV) analyses of BRCA genes. The aim of this study was to explore the prognostic and predictive role of sBRCA mutations as compared to gBRCA mutations in patients who were also tested for CNVs. Among the 158 patients included in the study, 17.09% of patients carried a pathogenic or likely pathogenic gBRCA variant and 15.19% of patients presented pathogenetic or likely pathogenic sBRCA variants and/or CNVs. Overall, 81.6% of the patients included in this study were diagnosed with a serous histotype, and 77.2% were in advanced stages. Among women diagnosed in advanced stages, gBRCA patients showed better progression-free survival and OS as compared to sBRCA and wild-type patients, whereas sBRCA patients did not show any advantage in outcome as compared to wild-type patients. In this study, the introduction of CNV analyses increased the detection rate of sBRCA mutations, and the resulting classification among gBRCA, sBRCA and wild-type patients was able to properly stratify the prognosis of OC patients. Particularly, sBRCA mutation patients failed to show any outcome advantage as compared to wild-type patients.

The prognostic and predictive role of somatic brca mutations in ovarian cancer: Results from a multicenter cohort study / Toss, A.; Piombino, C.; Tenedini, E.; Bologna, A.; Gasparini, E.; Tarantino, V.; Filieri, M. E.; Cottafavi, L.; Giovanardi, F.; Madrigali, S.; Civallero, M.; Marcheselli, L.; Marchi, I.; Domati, F.; Venturelli, M.; Barbieri, E.; Grandi, G.; Tagliafico, E.; Cortesi, L.. - In: DIAGNOSTICS. - ISSN 2075-4418. - 11:3(2021), pp. N/A-N/A. [10.3390/diagnostics11030565]

The prognostic and predictive role of somatic brca mutations in ovarian cancer: Results from a multicenter cohort study

Toss A.;Tenedini E.;Grandi G.;Tagliafico E.;
2021

Abstract

Previous research involving epithelial ovarian cancer patients showed that, compared to germline BRCA (gBRCA) mutations, somatic BRCA (sBRCA) mutations present a similar positive impact with regard to overall survival (OS) and platinum and PARP (poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase) inhibitor sensitivity. Nevertheless, molecular testing in these studies did not include copy number variation (CNV) analyses of BRCA genes. The aim of this study was to explore the prognostic and predictive role of sBRCA mutations as compared to gBRCA mutations in patients who were also tested for CNVs. Among the 158 patients included in the study, 17.09% of patients carried a pathogenic or likely pathogenic gBRCA variant and 15.19% of patients presented pathogenetic or likely pathogenic sBRCA variants and/or CNVs. Overall, 81.6% of the patients included in this study were diagnosed with a serous histotype, and 77.2% were in advanced stages. Among women diagnosed in advanced stages, gBRCA patients showed better progression-free survival and OS as compared to sBRCA and wild-type patients, whereas sBRCA patients did not show any advantage in outcome as compared to wild-type patients. In this study, the introduction of CNV analyses increased the detection rate of sBRCA mutations, and the resulting classification among gBRCA, sBRCA and wild-type patients was able to properly stratify the prognosis of OC patients. Particularly, sBRCA mutation patients failed to show any outcome advantage as compared to wild-type patients.
2021
11
3
N/A
N/A
The prognostic and predictive role of somatic brca mutations in ovarian cancer: Results from a multicenter cohort study / Toss, A.; Piombino, C.; Tenedini, E.; Bologna, A.; Gasparini, E.; Tarantino, V.; Filieri, M. E.; Cottafavi, L.; Giovanardi, F.; Madrigali, S.; Civallero, M.; Marcheselli, L.; Marchi, I.; Domati, F.; Venturelli, M.; Barbieri, E.; Grandi, G.; Tagliafico, E.; Cortesi, L.. - In: DIAGNOSTICS. - ISSN 2075-4418. - 11:3(2021), pp. N/A-N/A. [10.3390/diagnostics11030565]
Toss, A.; Piombino, C.; Tenedini, E.; Bologna, A.; Gasparini, E.; Tarantino, V.; Filieri, M. E.; Cottafavi, L.; Giovanardi, F.; Madrigali, S.; Civallero, M.; Marcheselli, L.; Marchi, I.; Domati, F.; Venturelli, M.; Barbieri, E.; Grandi, G.; Tagliafico, E.; Cortesi, L.
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
diagnostics-11-00565.pdf

Open access

Tipologia: Versione pubblicata dall'editore
Dimensione 1.88 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
1.88 MB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri
Pubblicazioni consigliate

Licenza Creative Commons
I metadati presenti in IRIS UNIMORE sono rilasciati con licenza Creative Commons CC0 1.0 Universal, mentre i file delle pubblicazioni sono rilasciati con licenza Attribuzione 4.0 Internazionale (CC BY 4.0), salvo diversa indicazione.
In caso di violazione di copyright, contattare Supporto Iris

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11380/1252137
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 5
  • Scopus 6
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 6
social impact