Geophilomorph centipedes are common arthropod soil predators, but very little is known about their preying behaviour and their diet. Here we develop an exploratory morpho-functional approach to better understand their feeding habits, based on the morphology of feeding-related structures. Through geometric morphometrics, in a sample of five geophilomorph species, we investigated morphological variation in the three most conspicuous component structures of their prey-catching apparatus. At intra-specific level, we found no strong evidence for sexual dimorphism, left-right directional asymmetries and allometry across adult stages. At inter-specific level, shape differences in the feeding apparatus among the sample species were highly significant and large, even between two congeneric species. We also found a significant covariation between the shapes of the three structures, including those that do not directly articulate with each other, suggesting some degree of morphological integration between the different structures of the prey-catching apparatus. This study suggests the effectiveness and power of geometric morphometrics for the quantitative study of centipede functional morphology and provides a basis for wider comparative investigations on their phenotypic evolution.

Shape variation of prey-catching structures in geophilomorph centipedes: A preliminary investigation using geometric morphometrics / Baiocco, Matteo; Bonato, Lucio; Cardini, Andrea Luigi; Fusco, Giuseppe. - In: ZOOLOGISCHER ANZEIGER. - ISSN 0044-5231. - 268:(2017), pp. 11-18. [10.1016/j.jcz.2017.04.010]

Shape variation of prey-catching structures in geophilomorph centipedes: A preliminary investigation using geometric morphometrics

CARDINI, Andrea Luigi;
2017

Abstract

Geophilomorph centipedes are common arthropod soil predators, but very little is known about their preying behaviour and their diet. Here we develop an exploratory morpho-functional approach to better understand their feeding habits, based on the morphology of feeding-related structures. Through geometric morphometrics, in a sample of five geophilomorph species, we investigated morphological variation in the three most conspicuous component structures of their prey-catching apparatus. At intra-specific level, we found no strong evidence for sexual dimorphism, left-right directional asymmetries and allometry across adult stages. At inter-specific level, shape differences in the feeding apparatus among the sample species were highly significant and large, even between two congeneric species. We also found a significant covariation between the shapes of the three structures, including those that do not directly articulate with each other, suggesting some degree of morphological integration between the different structures of the prey-catching apparatus. This study suggests the effectiveness and power of geometric morphometrics for the quantitative study of centipede functional morphology and provides a basis for wider comparative investigations on their phenotypic evolution.
2017
268
11
18
Shape variation of prey-catching structures in geophilomorph centipedes: A preliminary investigation using geometric morphometrics / Baiocco, Matteo; Bonato, Lucio; Cardini, Andrea Luigi; Fusco, Giuseppe. - In: ZOOLOGISCHER ANZEIGER. - ISSN 0044-5231. - 268:(2017), pp. 11-18. [10.1016/j.jcz.2017.04.010]
Baiocco, Matteo; Bonato, Lucio; Cardini, Andrea Luigi; Fusco, Giuseppe
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.
Pubblicazioni consigliate

Licenza Creative Commons
I metadati presenti in IRIS UNIMORE sono rilasciati con licenza Creative Commons CC0 1.0 Universal, mentre i file delle pubblicazioni sono rilasciati con licenza Attribuzione 4.0 Internazionale (CC BY 4.0), salvo diversa indicazione.
In caso di violazione di copyright, contattare Supporto Iris

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11380/1136890
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 7
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 6
social impact