This paper focuses on adjectival secondary predicates and argues that they are functional projections of a secondary predicate (SP) category realized as two major varieties: DEP for depictives (and other SPs associated with the depictive) and RES for resultatives. These functional heads are each semantically specified to temporally link the state denoted by the adjective to an event (Pylkkänen 2002, Kratzer 2004). The present analysis assumes that the host NP is base-generated as an argument of the adjective and ends up occupying the specifier position of the secondary predicate phrase (SP- P). Based on Hornstein’s (2001) movement analysis of Control, the specifier of the SP-P moves into a θ-position (see also Grebenyova 2005 and Marušič et al. 2003). The syntactic and semantic distribution of secondary predicates support two configurations: syntactically-dependent SP-Ps (depictives and resultatives) are merged as complements of V; syntactically-independent SP-Ps (circumstantials and absolutes) are adjoined to VP.

Irimia, Monica Alexandrina. "Types of secondary predication" Working paper, TORONTO WORKING PAPERS IN LINGUISTICS, TORONTO WORKING PAPERS IN LINGUISTICS, University of Toronto, 2005.

Types of secondary predication

IRIMIA, Monica Alexandrina
2005

Abstract

This paper focuses on adjectival secondary predicates and argues that they are functional projections of a secondary predicate (SP) category realized as two major varieties: DEP for depictives (and other SPs associated with the depictive) and RES for resultatives. These functional heads are each semantically specified to temporally link the state denoted by the adjective to an event (Pylkkänen 2002, Kratzer 2004). The present analysis assumes that the host NP is base-generated as an argument of the adjective and ends up occupying the specifier position of the secondary predicate phrase (SP- P). Based on Hornstein’s (2001) movement analysis of Control, the specifier of the SP-P moves into a θ-position (see also Grebenyova 2005 and Marušič et al. 2003). The syntactic and semantic distribution of secondary predicates support two configurations: syntactically-dependent SP-Ps (depictives and resultatives) are merged as complements of V; syntactically-independent SP-Ps (circumstantials and absolutes) are adjoined to VP.
2005
Novembre
http://twpl.library.utoronto.ca/index.php/twpl/issue/view/470
Irimia, Monica Alexandrina
Irimia, Monica Alexandrina. "Types of secondary predication" Working paper, TORONTO WORKING PAPERS IN LINGUISTICS, TORONTO WORKING PAPERS IN LINGUISTICS, University of Toronto, 2005.
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.
Pubblicazioni consigliate

Licenza Creative Commons
I metadati presenti in IRIS UNIMORE sono rilasciati con licenza Creative Commons CC0 1.0 Universal, mentre i file delle pubblicazioni sono rilasciati con licenza Attribuzione 4.0 Internazionale (CC BY 4.0), salvo diversa indicazione.
In caso di violazione di copyright, contattare Supporto Iris

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11380/1130167
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact