The invention of thermally resistant ceramic cooking vessels around 15,000 years ago was a major advance in human diet and nutrition(1-3), opening up new food groups and preparation techniques. Previous investigations of lipid biomarkers contained in food residues have routinely demonstrated the importance of prehistoric cooking pots for the processing of animal products across the world(4). Remarkably, however, direct evidence for plant processing in prehistoric pottery has not been forthcoming, despite the potential to cook otherwise unpalatable or even toxic plants(2,5). In North Africa, archaeobotanical evidence of charred and desiccated plant organs denotes that Early Holocene hunter-gatherers routinely exploited a wide range of plant resources(6). Here, we reveal the earliest direct evidence for plant processing in pottery globally, from the sites of Takarkori and Uan Afuda in the Libyan Sahara, dated to 8200-6400 bc. Characteristic carbon number distributions and δ(13)C values for plant wax-derived n-alkanes and alkanoic acids indicate sustained and systematic processing of C3/C4 grasses and aquatic plants, gathered from the savannahs and lakes in the Early to Middle Holocene green Sahara.

Earliest direct evidence of plant processing in prehistoric Saharan pottery / Dunne, Julie; Mercuri, Anna Maria; Evershed, Richard P; Bruni, Silvia; di Lernia, Savino. - In: NATURE PLANTS. - ISSN 2055-0278. - ELETTRONICO. - 3:(2016), pp. 16194-16199. [10.1038/nplants.2016.194]

Earliest direct evidence of plant processing in prehistoric Saharan pottery

MERCURI, Anna Maria;
2016

Abstract

The invention of thermally resistant ceramic cooking vessels around 15,000 years ago was a major advance in human diet and nutrition(1-3), opening up new food groups and preparation techniques. Previous investigations of lipid biomarkers contained in food residues have routinely demonstrated the importance of prehistoric cooking pots for the processing of animal products across the world(4). Remarkably, however, direct evidence for plant processing in prehistoric pottery has not been forthcoming, despite the potential to cook otherwise unpalatable or even toxic plants(2,5). In North Africa, archaeobotanical evidence of charred and desiccated plant organs denotes that Early Holocene hunter-gatherers routinely exploited a wide range of plant resources(6). Here, we reveal the earliest direct evidence for plant processing in pottery globally, from the sites of Takarkori and Uan Afuda in the Libyan Sahara, dated to 8200-6400 bc. Characteristic carbon number distributions and δ(13)C values for plant wax-derived n-alkanes and alkanoic acids indicate sustained and systematic processing of C3/C4 grasses and aquatic plants, gathered from the savannahs and lakes in the Early to Middle Holocene green Sahara.
2016
19-dic-2016
3
16194
16199
Earliest direct evidence of plant processing in prehistoric Saharan pottery / Dunne, Julie; Mercuri, Anna Maria; Evershed, Richard P; Bruni, Silvia; di Lernia, Savino. - In: NATURE PLANTS. - ISSN 2055-0278. - ELETTRONICO. - 3:(2016), pp. 16194-16199. [10.1038/nplants.2016.194]
Dunne, Julie; Mercuri, Anna Maria; Evershed, Richard P; Bruni, Silvia; di Lernia, Savino
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
NPLANTS.2016.194_auproof.pdf

Open access

Descrizione: articolo principale
Tipologia: Versione dell'autore revisionata e accettata per la pubblicazione
Dimensione 2.45 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
2.45 MB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri
dunne2016.pdf

Accesso riservato

Tipologia: Versione pubblicata dall'editore
Dimensione 5.39 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
5.39 MB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia
Pubblicazioni consigliate

Licenza Creative Commons
I metadati presenti in IRIS UNIMORE sono rilasciati con licenza Creative Commons CC0 1.0 Universal, mentre i file delle pubblicazioni sono rilasciati con licenza Attribuzione 4.0 Internazionale (CC BY 4.0), salvo diversa indicazione.
In caso di violazione di copyright, contattare Supporto Iris

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11380/1121484
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 20
  • Scopus 109
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 93
social impact