Myomectomy is the most frequent reproductive surgery to preserve, improve fertility, or both. The present study was designed to assess the safety and efficacy of minilaparotomy for myomectomy through a systematic review of randomized and non-randomized controlled trials with a meta-analysis. All available studies comparing minilaparotomy myomectomy with laparotomy, other minimally invasive surgeries, or both, were included. Available surgical and reproductive data were extrapolated, and a qualitative and quantitative analysis was carried out. Fourteen studies were included in the final analysis for an overall sample of 2151 patients. A total of 1139 patients were treated with minilaparotomy, whereas 239 and 773 patients were treated, respectively, with the laparotomy or laparoscopy. Only two studies comparing minilaparotomy with laparoscopy assessed the reproductive outcomes, and their data synthesis did not demonstrate significant difference between the two surgical techniques. Specific surgical end-points differed significantly between minilaparotomy and laparotomy or laparoscopy, even if those differences were not clinically relevant. In conclusion, current data do not permit a definite conclusion to be drawn. Further studies are needed to clarify the risk-benefit ratio of the minilaparotomy compared with the other minimally invasive surgical procedures for myomectomy to provide clinical recommendations with strong scientific evidence.

Safety and efficacy of the minilaparotomy for myomectomy: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized and non-randomized controlled trials / Palomba, Stefano; Fornaciari, Eleonora; Falbo, Angela; La Sala, Giovanni Battista. - In: REPRODUCTIVE BIOMEDICINE ONLINE. - ISSN 1472-6483. - 30:5(2015), pp. 462-481. [10.1016/j.rbmo.2015.01.013]

Safety and efficacy of the minilaparotomy for myomectomy: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized and non-randomized controlled trials

Palomba, Stefano;LA SALA, Giovanni Battista
2015

Abstract

Myomectomy is the most frequent reproductive surgery to preserve, improve fertility, or both. The present study was designed to assess the safety and efficacy of minilaparotomy for myomectomy through a systematic review of randomized and non-randomized controlled trials with a meta-analysis. All available studies comparing minilaparotomy myomectomy with laparotomy, other minimally invasive surgeries, or both, were included. Available surgical and reproductive data were extrapolated, and a qualitative and quantitative analysis was carried out. Fourteen studies were included in the final analysis for an overall sample of 2151 patients. A total of 1139 patients were treated with minilaparotomy, whereas 239 and 773 patients were treated, respectively, with the laparotomy or laparoscopy. Only two studies comparing minilaparotomy with laparoscopy assessed the reproductive outcomes, and their data synthesis did not demonstrate significant difference between the two surgical techniques. Specific surgical end-points differed significantly between minilaparotomy and laparotomy or laparoscopy, even if those differences were not clinically relevant. In conclusion, current data do not permit a definite conclusion to be drawn. Further studies are needed to clarify the risk-benefit ratio of the minilaparotomy compared with the other minimally invasive surgical procedures for myomectomy to provide clinical recommendations with strong scientific evidence.
2015
30
5
462
481
Safety and efficacy of the minilaparotomy for myomectomy: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized and non-randomized controlled trials / Palomba, Stefano; Fornaciari, Eleonora; Falbo, Angela; La Sala, Giovanni Battista. - In: REPRODUCTIVE BIOMEDICINE ONLINE. - ISSN 1472-6483. - 30:5(2015), pp. 462-481. [10.1016/j.rbmo.2015.01.013]
Palomba, Stefano; Fornaciari, Eleonora; Falbo, Angela; La Sala, Giovanni Battista
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Palomba S 2015 Reprod Biomed Online (30).pdf

Accesso riservato

Tipologia: Versione pubblicata dall'editore
Dimensione 2.69 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
2.69 MB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia
Pubblicazioni consigliate

Licenza Creative Commons
I metadati presenti in IRIS UNIMORE sono rilasciati con licenza Creative Commons CC0 1.0 Universal, mentre i file delle pubblicazioni sono rilasciati con licenza Attribuzione 4.0 Internazionale (CC BY 4.0), salvo diversa indicazione.
In caso di violazione di copyright, contattare Supporto Iris

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11380/1117189
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 2
  • Scopus 16
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 11
social impact