The present article aims to understand how the third union dilemma in an organizational dimension ties itself with diversity management taking place in the union and how migrant working in the union engage with diversity management. An important literature strand focusing on the relationship between unions and migrants explores possible responses of unions to face the emergence of new social subjects (Holgate, 2011; Savage, 2006; Milkman, 2000; Osterman, 2006). Within this literature strand the organizing strategies of migrant workers are generally taken as an opportunity for the revitalization of unions (Milkman, 2011; Fitzgerald and Hardy, 2010). In addition to this recent literature focusing on organizing strategies, it is also possible to identify another literature strand focused on longrunning changes of the relationship between trade unions and migrants. A pioneering work in this direction is the one from Castles and Kosack (1973) in the early ’70s. In a very different historical context, Penninx and Roosblad (2000) identify three union dilemmas affecting relationship between trade unions and migrants. The first dilemma forces the unions to choose whether to adopt an attitude of migration contrast or to be a part of the migration policy-making. The second dilemma comes when migrants are already integrated into the labor market: unions have to choose whether organizing and recruiting migrants or excluding them. The third dilemma arises in case migrants’ recruitment by the unions takes place. Unions cope with the choice whether to represent the common interests of its membership base as a whole or, rather, to represent distinct interests of migrant workers. Since the 70s of last century, along with socioeconomic and political changes that have affected Western European countries (and not only), there has been a deep transformation of migration processes and migration policies. In the last 40 years trade unions, both in old and in new immigration countries, have tended to take a stand more and more open to migration and recruitment of migrants. All this leads several scholars to consider overcome at least the first two of the three dilemmas identified: migrants actually have arrived and have entered into trade unions. This doesn’t mean that the unionization of migrants does not have critical dimensions, but it is evident that in the recent past the relationship between unions and migrants has been structured.

Migrants, third union dilemma and organizational responses to migrants’ incorporation within union structures. The case study of an Italian trade union / Rinaldini, Matteo. - In: MONDI MIGRANTI. - ISSN 1972-4888. - STAMPA. - 2015:1(2015), pp. 151-169. [10.3280/MM2015-001008]

Migrants, third union dilemma and organizational responses to migrants’ incorporation within union structures. The case study of an Italian trade union

RINALDINI, Matteo
2015

Abstract

The present article aims to understand how the third union dilemma in an organizational dimension ties itself with diversity management taking place in the union and how migrant working in the union engage with diversity management. An important literature strand focusing on the relationship between unions and migrants explores possible responses of unions to face the emergence of new social subjects (Holgate, 2011; Savage, 2006; Milkman, 2000; Osterman, 2006). Within this literature strand the organizing strategies of migrant workers are generally taken as an opportunity for the revitalization of unions (Milkman, 2011; Fitzgerald and Hardy, 2010). In addition to this recent literature focusing on organizing strategies, it is also possible to identify another literature strand focused on longrunning changes of the relationship between trade unions and migrants. A pioneering work in this direction is the one from Castles and Kosack (1973) in the early ’70s. In a very different historical context, Penninx and Roosblad (2000) identify three union dilemmas affecting relationship between trade unions and migrants. The first dilemma forces the unions to choose whether to adopt an attitude of migration contrast or to be a part of the migration policy-making. The second dilemma comes when migrants are already integrated into the labor market: unions have to choose whether organizing and recruiting migrants or excluding them. The third dilemma arises in case migrants’ recruitment by the unions takes place. Unions cope with the choice whether to represent the common interests of its membership base as a whole or, rather, to represent distinct interests of migrant workers. Since the 70s of last century, along with socioeconomic and political changes that have affected Western European countries (and not only), there has been a deep transformation of migration processes and migration policies. In the last 40 years trade unions, both in old and in new immigration countries, have tended to take a stand more and more open to migration and recruitment of migrants. All this leads several scholars to consider overcome at least the first two of the three dilemmas identified: migrants actually have arrived and have entered into trade unions. This doesn’t mean that the unionization of migrants does not have critical dimensions, but it is evident that in the recent past the relationship between unions and migrants has been structured.
2015
2015
1
151
169
Migrants, third union dilemma and organizational responses to migrants’ incorporation within union structures. The case study of an Italian trade union / Rinaldini, Matteo. - In: MONDI MIGRANTI. - ISSN 1972-4888. - STAMPA. - 2015:1(2015), pp. 151-169. [10.3280/MM2015-001008]
Rinaldini, Matteo
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
VOR_Migrants, third union dilemma and organizational responses.pdf

Accesso riservato

Tipologia: Versione pubblicata dall'editore
Dimensione 7.3 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
7.3 MB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia
MM.CRIMT. Migrants, third union dilemma and organizational responses ... pulito e ulteriormente revisionato 09 03 2015 def.pdf

Open access

Tipologia: Versione dell'autore revisionata e accettata per la pubblicazione
Dimensione 650.96 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
650.96 kB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri
Pubblicazioni consigliate

Licenza Creative Commons
I metadati presenti in IRIS UNIMORE sono rilasciati con licenza Creative Commons CC0 1.0 Universal, mentre i file delle pubblicazioni sono rilasciati con licenza Attribuzione 4.0 Internazionale (CC BY 4.0), salvo diversa indicazione.
In caso di violazione di copyright, contattare Supporto Iris

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11380/1114915
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact