We investigate whether lack of familiarity with the companies in the stock market index may contribute to a gender gap in stock market participation and risk taking. We consider the Netherlands because recent reforms have reduced the generosity of mandatory pension and social security arrangements and created the need for many employees to decide on how to allocate (pension) savings. Moreover, the gender gap in pensions in the Netherlands is above that of the OECD average. We construct a «pink» portfolio with stocks that are supposed to be more familiar to women (based on ads in widely read women magazines) and a «blue» one with stocks from the market index (AEX). We then ask members of the CentERpanel how they would allocate a certain amount of pension wealth between government bonds and a stock portfolio, whereby half of respondents, randomly selected, are given the pink portfolio and half the blue one as an alternative to bonds. Based on a set of limited dependent variable models, we find that familiarity is correlated to decision time for women, but it affects risk-taking only for women over 60. We do find a strong response order effect on risk taking, which moreover is larger for women than for men, and interpret the latter as reflecting a gender gap in confidence.

Do women prefer pink? The effect of a gender stereotypical stock portfolio on investing decisions / Prast, Henriëtte; Rossi, Mariacristina; Torricelli, Costanza; Sansone, Dario. - In: POLITICA ECONOMICA. - ISSN 1120-9496. - STAMPA. - 31:3(2015), pp. 377-420. [10.1429/81935]

Do women prefer pink? The effect of a gender stereotypical stock portfolio on investing decisions

TORRICELLI, Costanza;
2015

Abstract

We investigate whether lack of familiarity with the companies in the stock market index may contribute to a gender gap in stock market participation and risk taking. We consider the Netherlands because recent reforms have reduced the generosity of mandatory pension and social security arrangements and created the need for many employees to decide on how to allocate (pension) savings. Moreover, the gender gap in pensions in the Netherlands is above that of the OECD average. We construct a «pink» portfolio with stocks that are supposed to be more familiar to women (based on ads in widely read women magazines) and a «blue» one with stocks from the market index (AEX). We then ask members of the CentERpanel how they would allocate a certain amount of pension wealth between government bonds and a stock portfolio, whereby half of respondents, randomly selected, are given the pink portfolio and half the blue one as an alternative to bonds. Based on a set of limited dependent variable models, we find that familiarity is correlated to decision time for women, but it affects risk-taking only for women over 60. We do find a strong response order effect on risk taking, which moreover is larger for women than for men, and interpret the latter as reflecting a gender gap in confidence.
2015
31
3
377
420
Do women prefer pink? The effect of a gender stereotypical stock portfolio on investing decisions / Prast, Henriëtte; Rossi, Mariacristina; Torricelli, Costanza; Sansone, Dario. - In: POLITICA ECONOMICA. - ISSN 1120-9496. - STAMPA. - 31:3(2015), pp. 377-420. [10.1429/81935]
Prast, Henriëtte; Rossi, Mariacristina; Torricelli, Costanza; Sansone, Dario
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Prast et al_accepted_EPJEP_fulltxt.pdf

Open Access dal 02/07/2017

Descrizione: Articolo principale
Tipologia: Versione dell'autore revisionata e accettata per la pubblicazione
Dimensione 301.19 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
301.19 kB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri
Pubblicazioni consigliate

Licenza Creative Commons
I metadati presenti in IRIS UNIMORE sono rilasciati con licenza Creative Commons CC0 1.0 Universal, mentre i file delle pubblicazioni sono rilasciati con licenza Attribuzione 4.0 Internazionale (CC BY 4.0), salvo diversa indicazione.
In caso di violazione di copyright, contattare Supporto Iris

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11380/1104545
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 5
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 5
social impact