The present essay discusses the relationships between might (potentia) and power (potestas) as it has unfolded throughout the modern age, from Thomas Hobbes to Carl Schmitt. Hobbes indicates the way forward for a progressive linguistic and conceptual coincidence of potentia and potestas: the goal of Hobbesian political philosophy (the search for peace and security) necessitates the reduction of potentia to potestas through the elimination of the content of actus. Schmitt accepts this reduction, by assigning priority to potestas: the image of modern technology as a privileged dimension of potentia-potestas comes together as the modern State. Instead of taking the route of potentia understood as an opening up to new possibilities and as human self-affirmation, the language of potentia-potestas has triggered a process, which is that of a naturalisation of power relations, that is based on and justified by the social inequality arising from the differing extent of ownership of the instruments of technological production.

«Potentia» as «potestas». An Interpretation of Modern Politics between Thomas Hobbes and Carl Schmitt / Altini, Carlo. - In: PHILOSOPHY & SOCIAL CRITICISM. - ISSN 0191-4537. - XXXVI:2(2010), pp. 231-252. [10.1177/0191453709351850]

«Potentia» as «potestas». An Interpretation of Modern Politics between Thomas Hobbes and Carl Schmitt

ALTINI, CARLO
2010

Abstract

The present essay discusses the relationships between might (potentia) and power (potestas) as it has unfolded throughout the modern age, from Thomas Hobbes to Carl Schmitt. Hobbes indicates the way forward for a progressive linguistic and conceptual coincidence of potentia and potestas: the goal of Hobbesian political philosophy (the search for peace and security) necessitates the reduction of potentia to potestas through the elimination of the content of actus. Schmitt accepts this reduction, by assigning priority to potestas: the image of modern technology as a privileged dimension of potentia-potestas comes together as the modern State. Instead of taking the route of potentia understood as an opening up to new possibilities and as human self-affirmation, the language of potentia-potestas has triggered a process, which is that of a naturalisation of power relations, that is based on and justified by the social inequality arising from the differing extent of ownership of the instruments of technological production.
2010
XXXVI
2
231
252
«Potentia» as «potestas». An Interpretation of Modern Politics between Thomas Hobbes and Carl Schmitt / Altini, Carlo. - In: PHILOSOPHY & SOCIAL CRITICISM. - ISSN 0191-4537. - XXXVI:2(2010), pp. 231-252. [10.1177/0191453709351850]
Altini, Carlo
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Philosophy and Social Criticism.pdf

Accesso riservato

Tipologia: Versione pubblicata dall'editore
Dimensione 2.18 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
2.18 MB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia
Pubblicazioni consigliate

Licenza Creative Commons
I metadati presenti in IRIS UNIMORE sono rilasciati con licenza Creative Commons CC0 1.0 Universal, mentre i file delle pubblicazioni sono rilasciati con licenza Attribuzione 4.0 Internazionale (CC BY 4.0), salvo diversa indicazione.
In caso di violazione di copyright, contattare Supporto Iris

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11380/1073944
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 9
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 12
social impact